What is the significance of -Mu in equation equality and boundedness?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ssky
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
6 replies · 3K views
ssky
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
http://dc191.4shared.com/img/6pyFHiMb/s7/0.8584304740152441/706869958.jpg

I need more explanation for the first equation in the picture above:

Why we said that each side in the equation is equal (-Mu) ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi ssky! :smile:

(have a mu: µ :wink:)

the LHS is the same for all x, and the RHS is the same for all t,

and since they're equal, they must be the same for all x and t :smile:
 
:shy:

I am sorry,
can you explain more.
and why we took the negative value?
 
the equation has to be true for all values of x and t

the LHS is a function of t, but for a fixed value of t it is the same for all values of x …

if you were to plot it on a 3D graph, with horizontal x and t axes, it would be a hillside on which all the contour lines (lines of level height) were parallel to the t axis…

but the RHS would be a hillside on which all the contour lines (lines of level height) were parallel to the x axis …

but the LHS and the RHS have to be the same hillside …

the only way that can happen is if the hillside is completely flat! :smile:​
ssky said:
and why we took the negative value?

without seeing the previous page (which i don't want to :wink:), I've no idea :redface:
 
Actually, :rolleyes:

i didn't understand :biggrin:
:cry:
:confused:
:bugeye:
can you give me a clear example about this problem?


​
 
Last edited:
The equation looks like this:

f(t)=g(x)

The left side is a function of t only, and the right side a function of x only. Now, pick t=0.

f(0)=g(x)

This is true for ANY value of x, so it must be that g(x) is a constant function. Different values of x don't change g(x), because you always get f(0).

Similarly, if we set x=0 we get
f(t)=g(0)

This is true for every value of t, so f(t) is a constant function as well
 
ssky said:
:shy:

I am sorry,
can you explain more.
and why we took the negative value?
It says in what you posted "where the negative value was forced to warrent the boundedness of the function [itex]\Gamma(t)[/itex] as [itex]t\to \infty[/itex]".

I suspect that if you set it equal to "a" where a could be any constant, you would eventually get a function involving [itex]e^{at}[/itex] which will go to infinity if a is positive. Writing [itex]a= -\mu^2[/itex] where [itex]\mu[/itex] can be any real number forces a to be negative so that [itex]e^{at}[/itex] does NOT go to infinity and is bounded.
 
Last edited by a moderator: