What is the significance of the factor (2π)^3 in the completeness relation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The factor of (2π)³ in the completeness relation 1 = ∫ (dp/(2π)³) |p⟩⟨p| arises from the normalization conventions used in quantum mechanics, particularly in Fourier analysis. The state |p⟩ is normalized such that ⟨x|p⟩ = (1/(2π)^(3/2)) e^(ip·x), which leads to the inclusion of the (2π) factors in the momentum measure. This convention is standard in high-energy physics, where the orthonormality condition ⟨p|p'⟩ = δ(p-p') is preferred over ⟨p|p'⟩ = 2πδ(p-p'). The use of (2π) factors does not violate normalization conditions, as neither |p⟩ nor |x⟩ are normalizable states.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and completeness relations
  • Familiarity with Fourier transforms and their conventions
  • Knowledge of momentum space representation in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of delta functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the normalization conventions in quantum mechanics, focusing on the role of (2π) factors
  • Learn about the Fourier transform and its applications in momentum space
  • Explore the implications of non-normalizable states in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the differences in conventions used across various physics communities
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum state normalization and Fourier analysis.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I have dug several resources from the internet, but none happen to explain the following formula:

##1 = \int \frac{dp}{(2\pi)^{3}} |\vec{p}><\vec{p}|##

I have done basic quantum mechanics, so I know that this is the completeness relation. Also, I understand that an integral is being taken over all the momentum states. That's all fine by me.

What's tripping me up is the factor of ##(2\pi)^{3}##.

Can someone explain where they come from. I've thinking it has to do with Fourier analysis or something because the same funny factor appears when Fourier transform into momentum space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed it is related to the Fourier transform. The state ##|p\rangle## is the state normalised such that ##\langle x|p\rangle = e^{-ip\cdot x}##. Using ##\langle x|x'\rangle = \delta(x-x')## and the Fourier transform of the delta function, you will find the correct normalisation of the completeness relation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: VEReade, vanhees71 and bhobba
So, do you mean that if ##|p\rangle## were the state normalised such that ##\langle x|p\rangle = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} e^{ip\cdot x}##, then the correct normalisation of the completeness relation is ##1 = \int d^{3}p |p\rangle \langle p|##?
 
Yes. If you construct the state like that, the completeness relation would not have the factors of 2pi. The states would then be normalised such that ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')##.
 
Last edited:
The orthonormality condition ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')## looks more natural than ##\langle p|p'\rangle = 2 \pi \delta(p-p')##.

Don't the factors of ##2 \pi## violate the normalisation condition [the probability adding up to one] when ##p=p'##?
 
That's convention regarding the Fourier transformation. In the high-energy physics community one usually uses the convention
$$\tilde{f}(\omega,\vec{p})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 x \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t-\mathrm{i} \vec{p}\cdot \vec{x}),$$
$$f(t,\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 p \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^4} \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t+\mathrm{i} \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}),$$
i.e., one lumps all ##2 \pi## factors to the momentum measure.
 
failexam said:
The orthonormality condition ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')## looks more natural than ##\langle p|p'\rangle = 2 \pi \delta(p-p')##.

Don't the factors of ##2 \pi## violate the normalisation condition [the probability adding up to one] when ##p=p'##?

Neither the states ##|p\rangle## nor ##|x\rangle## are normalisable.
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K