What is the significance of the factor (2π)^3 in the completeness relation?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter spaghetti3451
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Relation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the significance of the factor \((2\pi)^3\) in the completeness relation in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of momentum states and their normalization. Participants explore the relationship between this factor and Fourier analysis, as well as the implications for orthonormality conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the origin of the factor \((2\pi)^3\) in the completeness relation, suggesting a connection to Fourier analysis.
  • Another participant confirms the relation to Fourier transforms, explaining the normalization of the state \(|p\rangle\) in terms of the delta function.
  • A question is raised about whether a different normalization of \(|p\rangle\) could eliminate the \((2\pi)\) factors from the completeness relation.
  • It is noted that using a different normalization would lead to a simpler orthonormality condition without the \((2\pi)\) factors.
  • One participant expresses concern that the \((2\pi)\) factors might violate normalization conditions when \(p = p'\).
  • A response indicates that the use of \((2\pi)\) factors is a convention in the high-energy physics community, where they are incorporated into the momentum measure.
  • Another participant reiterates the concern about normalization, stating that neither the states \(|p\rangle\) nor \(|x\rangle\) are normalizable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the normalization of states and the implications of the \((2\pi)\) factors, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the matter.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the normalization of states and the use of \((2\pi)\) factors are conventions that may vary across different contexts in physics, and that the implications for normalization conditions are not definitively settled.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
I have dug several resources from the internet, but none happen to explain the following formula:

##1 = \int \frac{dp}{(2\pi)^{3}} |\vec{p}><\vec{p}|##

I have done basic quantum mechanics, so I know that this is the completeness relation. Also, I understand that an integral is being taken over all the momentum states. That's all fine by me.

What's tripping me up is the factor of ##(2\pi)^{3}##.

Can someone explain where they come from. I've thinking it has to do with Fourier analysis or something because the same funny factor appears when Fourier transform into momentum space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Indeed it is related to the Fourier transform. The state ##|p\rangle## is the state normalised such that ##\langle x|p\rangle = e^{-ip\cdot x}##. Using ##\langle x|x'\rangle = \delta(x-x')## and the Fourier transform of the delta function, you will find the correct normalisation of the completeness relation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: VEReade, vanhees71 and bhobba
So, do you mean that if ##|p\rangle## were the state normalised such that ##\langle x|p\rangle = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{3/2}} e^{ip\cdot x}##, then the correct normalisation of the completeness relation is ##1 = \int d^{3}p |p\rangle \langle p|##?
 
Yes. If you construct the state like that, the completeness relation would not have the factors of 2pi. The states would then be normalised such that ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')##.
 
Last edited:
The orthonormality condition ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')## looks more natural than ##\langle p|p'\rangle = 2 \pi \delta(p-p')##.

Don't the factors of ##2 \pi## violate the normalisation condition [the probability adding up to one] when ##p=p'##?
 
That's convention regarding the Fourier transformation. In the high-energy physics community one usually uses the convention
$$\tilde{f}(\omega,\vec{p})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 x \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t-\mathrm{i} \vec{p}\cdot \vec{x}),$$
$$f(t,\vec{x})=\int_{\mathbb{R}^4} \mathrm{d}^4 p \frac{1}{(2 \pi)^4} \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t+\mathrm{i} \vec{p} \cdot \vec{x}),$$
i.e., one lumps all ##2 \pi## factors to the momentum measure.
 
failexam said:
The orthonormality condition ##\langle p|p'\rangle = \delta(p-p')## looks more natural than ##\langle p|p'\rangle = 2 \pi \delta(p-p')##.

Don't the factors of ##2 \pi## violate the normalisation condition [the probability adding up to one] when ##p=p'##?

Neither the states ##|p\rangle## nor ##|x\rangle## are normalisable.
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K