What is the solar radius of Rigel and Procyon B?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snabelpablo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radius Solar Star
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The solar radius of Rigel is calculated to be approximately 73 times that of the Sun, based on a corrected luminosity of 2.7 * 10^31 W and a surface temperature of 11,000 K. The initial calculation using an incorrect luminosity of 2.7 * 10^32 W yielded a radius of 231 solar radii. For Procyon B, using a luminosity of 2.1 * 10^23 W and a temperature of 10,000 K, the calculated solar radius is 0.0078 solar radii, which is significantly lower than the Wikipedia figure of 0.01234 solar radii. The discrepancies highlight the importance of accurate luminosity values in stellar radius calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Stefan-Boltzmann Law for radiation
  • Familiarity with the formulas for surface area and radius of a sphere
  • Knowledge of stellar luminosity and temperature relationships
  • Basic grasp of electromagnetic radiation principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Stefan-Boltzmann Law in detail
  • Learn about stellar luminosity and its calculation methods
  • Research the properties of Rigel and Procyon B for further context
  • Explore the impact of temperature on stellar characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysics students, and anyone interested in stellar properties and calculations will benefit from this discussion.

snabelpablo
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
A star's surface sends out energy in form of electromagnetic radiation and has an emissivity close to 1. Find the solar radius of Rigel that emits energy at a rate of 2,7 * 10^32W and has a surface temperature of 11000K. You may assume the star is spherical.

Attempt at solution:
Formula for the heat current in radiation: H = AeσT^4.
Solve this with respect to A gives surface area: A = H / (eσT^4) =
2.7 * 10^32 / (1 * (5,67 * 10^-8) * 11000^4) = 3,25 * 10^23 m^2.

Formula for the area of a sphere: A = 4πr^2.
Solve this with respect to r gives radius: r = (A / 4π)^0,5 =
(3,25 * 10^23 / 4π)^0,5 = 1,61 * 10^11 m.

The radius of the sun: 6,96 * 10^8 m.
Solar radius = (1,61 * 10^11) / (6,96 * 10^8) = 231,06Rsun.

The Rigel radius is 231 times the radius of the sun. However, Wikipedia says 78. I've also seen 63, 98 etc., but 231 sounds a bit high. What have I done wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The star's luminosity should be 2.7*10^31 W, not 2.7*10^32 W. With the correct luminosity, you get 23 solar radii, very close to Wikipedia's figure.
 
Perhaps one of the values given to you is incorrect. I'd guess it's the luminosity.
 
You are correct! The luminosity is in fact 2,7 * 10^31 W for Rigel giving it a solar radii of 73 using my formulas.

However, I have to do this for a second star as well, Procyon B.
Calculating its solar radius with the same formulas using H = 2,1 * 10^23W and T = 10000K I get:

A = 3,7 * 10^14 m^2.
r = 5,43 * 10^6 m.
Rsun = 0,0078.

Wikipedia says 0,01234 - almost twice what I got.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K