What is the solution to finding spanned subspaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Telemachus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the subspaces generated by a given set of vectors in \(\mathbb{R}^3\). Participants are exploring the linear dependence among the vectors and attempting to determine the nature of the subspace they span.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are analyzing a system of equations derived from the vectors to investigate linear dependence. Questions arise regarding the transition from two equations to additional relationships, such as \(d = -5c\). There is also discussion about the implications of having two free variables and whether this indicates a plane.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on manipulating the matrix to achieve row-echelon form, while others are questioning the effectiveness of certain steps taken. There is recognition that the original set of vectors cannot form a basis due to the number of vectors exceeding the dimension of the space.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the second vector is a multiple of the first, and there is speculation about the linear combination of the fourth vector with respect to the others. The discussion is constrained by the inherent properties of the vectors in \(\mathbb{R}^3\).

Telemachus
Messages
820
Reaction score
30
Hi, I'm trying to solve this exercise.

Homework Statement


Given the following subsets of [tex]\mathbb(R)^3[/tex] find the subspaces generated by them:
[tex]\{(1,0,-2),(-1,0,2),(3,0,-1),(-1,0,3)\}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to solve the linear dependence, so I've made the system:
[tex]\begin{Bmatrix} a-b+3c-d=0 \\-2a+2b-c+3d=0 \end{matrix}[/tex]

And I got: [tex]\begin{Bmatrix} a-b+8c=0 \\5c+4d=0 \end{matrix}[/tex]

[tex]a=b-8c[/tex] and [tex]d=-5c[/tex]

[tex](b-8c,b,c,-5c)[/tex]

I don't know what to do next. I know that there is a linear dependence, but I don't know how to work with it, and what to do with the result I've found. Does it mean that the solution is a plane because there are only two free variables in [tex](b-8c,b,c,-5c)[/tex]? and how do I get the solution from here.

Bye there, and thanks of course.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Telemachus said:
Hi, I'm trying to solve this exercise.

Homework Statement


Given the following subsets of [\ mathbb (R) ^ 3] find the subspaces generated by them:
[tex]\{(1,0,-2),(-1,0,2),(3,0,-1),(-1,0,3)\}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried to solve the linear dependence, so I've made the system:
[tex]\begin{Bmatrix} a-b+3c-d=0 \\-2a+2b-c+3d=0 \end{matrix}[/tex]

And I got: [tex]\begin{Bmatrix} a-b+3c-d=0 \\-2a+2b-c+3d=0 \end{matrix}[/tex] and [tex]d=-5c[/tex]
Where did the d = -5c come from? How did you go from two equations to the same two equations plus one more?
Telemachus said:
[tex](b-8c,b,c,-5c)[/tex]

I don't know what to do next. I know that there is a linear dependence, but I don't know how to work with it, and what to do with the result I've found. Does it mean that the solution is a plane because there are only two free variables in [tex](b-8c,b,c,-5c)[/tex]? and how do I get the solution from here.

Bye there, and thanks of course.
 
Lets see:

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}{1}&{-1}&{3}&{-1}\\{-2}&{2}&{-1}&{3}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
Twice the first row plus the second on the second:
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}{1}&{-1}&{3}&{-1}\\{0}&{0}&{5}&{1}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}{1}&{-1}&{8}&{0}\\{0}&{0}&{5}&{1}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

Thats what I did.

Srry, there was something wrong in my first post. I've just corrected it.
 
Telemachus said:
Lets see:

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}{1}&{-1}&{3}&{-1}\\{-2}&{2}&{-1}&{3}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
Twice the first row plus the second on the second:
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}{1}&{-1}&{3}&{-1}\\{0}&{0}&{5}&{1}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
The matrix above is fine.
Telemachus said:
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}{1}&{-1}&{8}&{0}\\{0}&{0}&{5}&{1}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
This didn't do you any good. You want to use leading entries in a row to eliminate nonleading entries in the rows above and below. Multiply the 2nd row to get 0 0 1 1/5, and use the leading entry in the second row to eliminate the 3 in the row above it. That will give you a completely reduced, row-echelon matrix.
Telemachus said:
Thats what I did.

Srry, there was something wrong in my first post. I've just corrected it.

The last step you did wasn't technically wrong - it just wasn't a big help.

Since the set of vectors you started with had four vectors in R3, there are obviously too many to form a basis for R3. By inspection you can see that the second vector is a multiple of the first.

It's not so easy to see (the work you are doing shows it), but the 4th vector is a linear combination of the first three. This means that the subspace spanned by the four vectors is the same as that spanned by the first and third.
 
Thank you very much Mark.

So, what I got is:

[tex]\begin{bmatrix}{1}&{-1}&{0}&{-8/5}\\{0}&{0}&{1}&{1/5}\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

How should I use this?
 
Last edited:
I prefer your original form:
[tex]\a(1,0,-2)+ b(-1,0,2)+ c(3,0,-1)+ d(-1,0,3)[/tex]
Although I would NOT use that to "solve the independence" (you KNOW they are not independent because there are 4 vectors in [itex]R^3[/itex]).

Any vector in that subspace can be written
[tex](x, y, z)= a(1,0,-2)+ b(-1,0,2)+ c(3,0,-1)+ d(-1,0,3)[/tex]
or
[tex](x, y, z)= (a- b+ 3c- d, 0, -2a- 2b- c+ 3d)[/tex]

One obvious result is that y= 0. Now, what further relationships can you find between x and z?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, [tex]x=a-b+3c-d[/tex] and [tex]z=-2a-2b-c+3d[/tex]

And as I said [tex]a=b-8c[/tex] and [tex]d=-5c[/tex], so...

[tex]x=b-8c-b+3c-5c=-10c[/tex] and [tex]z=-2(b-8c)-2b-c+3(-5c)=-2b-16c-2b-c-15c=-32c-4b[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K