MHB What is the solution to Problem B-5 in the 1997 Putnam Competition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Click For Summary
The problem B-5 from the 1997 Putnam Competition asks to prove that for n≥2, the expression with n terms of exponentiation of 2 is congruent to the expression with n-1 terms modulo n. The discussion highlights that no participants provided a solution for this week’s Problem of the Week (POTW). The solution is credited to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates. Participants are encouraged to refer to the provided links for guidelines on submitting solutions. The focus remains on the mathematical proof of the stated congruence.
Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Prove that for $n\geq 2$,
\[
\overbrace{2^{2^{\cdots^{2}}}}^{\mbox{$n$ terms}} \equiv
\overbrace{2^{2^{\cdots^{2}}}}^{\mbox{$n-1$ terms}} \quad \pmod{n}.
\]

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Problem Of The Week # 236 - Oct 06, 2016

This was Problem B-5 in the 1997 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

No one answered this week's POTW. The solution, attributed to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates, follows:

Define the sequence $x_1 = 2$, $x_n = 2^{x_{n-1}}$ for $n > 1$. It suffices to show that for every $n$, $x_m \equiv x_{m+1} \equiv \cdots \pmod n$ for some $m < n.$ We do this by induction on $n$, with $n=2$ being obvious.

Write $n = 2^a b$, where $b$ is odd. It suffices to show that $x_m \equiv \cdots$ modulo $2^a$ and modulo $b$, for some $m < n$. For the former, we only need $x_{n-1} \geq a$, but clearly $x_{n-1} \geq n$ by induction on $n$. For the latter, note that $x_m \equiv x_{m+1} \equiv \cdots\pmod b$ as long as $x_{m-1} \equiv x_m \equiv \cdots \pmod{\phi(b)}$, where $\phi(n)$ is the Euler totient function. By hypothesis, this occurs for some $m < \phi(b) + 1 \leq n$.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K