What is the solution to Problem B-5 in the 1997 Putnam Competition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ackbach
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2016
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The solution to Problem B-5 from the 1997 Putnam Competition states that for any integer \( n \geq 2 \), the expression \( \overbrace{2^{2^{\cdots^{2}}}}^{\mbox{$n$ terms}} \equiv \overbrace{2^{2^{\cdots^{2}}}}^{\mbox{$n-1$ terms}} \quad \pmod{n} \) holds true. This result is confirmed through modular arithmetic techniques and is attributed to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates. The problem emphasizes the significance of understanding exponentiation in modular contexts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with exponentiation notation
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical proofs
  • Experience with competition-level mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study modular exponentiation techniques
  • Explore the properties of congruences in number theory
  • Review advanced topics in combinatorial number theory
  • Practice with past Putnam Competition problems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, competitive problem solvers, and educators seeking to deepen their understanding of modular arithmetic and its applications in mathematical competitions.

Ackbach
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,148
Reaction score
94
Here is this week's POTW:

-----

Prove that for $n\geq 2$,
\[
\overbrace{2^{2^{\cdots^{2}}}}^{\mbox{$n$ terms}} \equiv
\overbrace{2^{2^{\cdots^{2}}}}^{\mbox{$n-1$ terms}} \quad \pmod{n}.
\]

-----

Remember to read the http://www.mathhelpboards.com/showthread.php?772-Problem-of-the-Week-%28POTW%29-Procedure-and-Guidelines to find out how to http://www.mathhelpboards.com/forms.php?do=form&fid=2!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: Problem Of The Week # 236 - Oct 06, 2016

This was Problem B-5 in the 1997 William Lowell Putnam Mathematical Competition.

No one answered this week's POTW. The solution, attributed to Kiran Kedlaya and his associates, follows:

Define the sequence $x_1 = 2$, $x_n = 2^{x_{n-1}}$ for $n > 1$. It suffices to show that for every $n$, $x_m \equiv x_{m+1} \equiv \cdots \pmod n$ for some $m < n.$ We do this by induction on $n$, with $n=2$ being obvious.

Write $n = 2^a b$, where $b$ is odd. It suffices to show that $x_m \equiv \cdots$ modulo $2^a$ and modulo $b$, for some $m < n$. For the former, we only need $x_{n-1} \geq a$, but clearly $x_{n-1} \geq n$ by induction on $n$. For the latter, note that $x_m \equiv x_{m+1} \equiv \cdots\pmod b$ as long as $x_{m-1} \equiv x_m \equiv \cdots \pmod{\phi(b)}$, where $\phi(n)$ is the Euler totient function. By hypothesis, this occurs for some $m < \phi(b) + 1 \leq n$.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K