What Is the Speed of a Block at Different Points on a Frictionless Hill?

  • Thread starter Thread starter misyg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Velocity
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block sliding down a frictionless hill, focusing on the block's speed at various points along its descent. The problem incorporates concepts of kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, and possibly spring potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of energy conservation principles, questioning the setup of energy equations and the handling of potential energy terms. There is an exploration of the calculations involved in determining the speeds at different points.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and suggesting adjustments. Some guidance has been offered regarding potential errors in the calculations, and there is an emphasis on clarifying the use of mass in the equations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the spring potential energy is negligible or set to zero, and there is a focus on ensuring correct unit conversions and application of energy principles.

misyg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A 250g block slides down a frictionless hill. If the hill is 1.2m high and the speed of the block is 5 m/s when it is halfway down, what was the speed of the block at the bottom and at the top?

I tried using the equation KE(top)+GPE(top)+SPE(top)=KE(middle)+GPE(middle)+SPE(middle) and the same for the middle+bottom But I just could not figure out the correct answer.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming your SPE is spring potential energy, and you're setting that value to zero, you're on the right track. Can you post your actual calculation steps? I should be able to point you in the right direction if you show me how you plugged your numbers in for your calculations =)
 
Last edited:
I set them equal to zero, the SPE, and came up with the equation for the top and middle of the hill...top(1/2mv2)+(mgh)=(1/2mv2)+(mgh)middle...(1.25v2)+(2.94)=(3.125)+(1.47)
v2=1.324
vtop=1.1507

does that sound correct.
 
Well, the approach was fine, however it looks like you made a little mistake on converting your mass, judging by your coefficient in front of v². it looks like you used the correct mass for the rest of your values however, so it must have been just a little slip up for that one. Try solving it using .125 instead and see if that gets you your answer =)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K