What is the Staircase Line in a Unit Square?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fourier jr
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on creating a zig-zag staircase line within a unit square, illustrating that the total distance of the vertical and horizontal segments always sums to 2, regardless of how many segments are added. This phenomenon highlights a paradox where, despite the line visually approximating a diagonal, its length remains constant at 2, while the actual diagonal measures √2. The conversation touches on concepts like Minkowski's L1 distance and the Weyl Tile argument, linking them to broader implications in the philosophy of mathematics and geometric measure theory. Participants also reference external resources for further exploration of these mathematical principles. The discussion emphasizes the intriguing nature of geometric constructs and their implications in theoretical mathematics.
fourier jr
Messages
764
Reaction score
13
Take the unit square & make a zig-zag line like a staircase from one corner to the opposite one. Then the total distance if you add up the vertical parts & & horizontal parts is 2. Even if you make trillions & trillions of 'stairs' the sum of all the vertical parts & horizontal parts is still 2 even though the graph would look more & more like a diagonal line, whose length of course is \sqrt{2}. Someone mentioned this example before & put up a link to the mathworld page on it but I couldn't find it & nothing I searched for seemed to work. :confused:
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hummm... fractals?
 
The diagonal paradox, again. Use the search button. :smile:
 
Minkowski's L1 distance

Taxicab metric?
 
Weyl Tile argument

fourier jr said:
Take the unit square & make a zig-zag line like a staircase from one corner to the opposite one. Then the total distance if you add up the vertical parts & & horizontal parts is 2. Even if you make trillions & trillions of 'stairs' the sum of all the vertical parts & horizontal parts is still 2 even though the graph would look more & more like a diagonal line, whose length of course is \sqrt{2}. Someone mentioned this example before & put up a link to the mathworld page on it but I couldn't find it & nothing I searched for seemed to work. :confused:

It's related to the "Weyl Tile argument", which is discussed in some books on philosophy of mathematics, and even some web pages:
http://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/320/atomism.htm
The argument as stated there isn't serious, but this has serious applications to why naive "quantization" of space won't work. See spin networks for a more sophisticated approach: http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/penrose/

It's also related to a "paradox" in geometric measure theory, which is probably closer to the applications you have in mind, huh? See p. 129 of Spivak, Calculus on Manifolds.
 
Last edited:
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K