What is the Supremum of a Set in ℝ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mtayab1994
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Supremum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of the supremum of a set in the real numbers, specifically for the set defined as T = {t ∈ ℝ | t² < 2}. Participants are tasked with justifying the existence of a supremum, proving certain propositions about the supremum, and exploring contradictions related to the properties of the set.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the existence of a supremum for the set T and the implications of assuming different values for the supremum. There are attempts to use proof by contradiction to explore the relationships between the supremum and the bounds of the set.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on how to approach the proof, particularly regarding the need to demonstrate that if a² < 2, then there exists an element in T that is greater than a. Others have pointed out potential misunderstandings in the reasoning and have suggested clarifying assumptions and definitions.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the implications of the completeness axiom and the properties of real numbers, while also addressing the need for explicit examples and clearer definitions in their arguments.

mtayab1994
Messages
584
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let T be a set such that:
[tex]T=\{t\in\mathbb{R}/t^{2}<2\}[/tex]


Homework Equations



a) Justify the existence of a real number a such that a=Sup(T)

b) Prove that the proposition [tex]a^{2}<2[/tex] is false.

c) Suppose that [tex]a^{2}>2[/tex]. Prove that we can find a contradiction with a=Sup(T).

d) Conclude that finally [tex]a^{2}=2[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution



a) Ok we have [tex]t^{2}<2[/tex] which implies t<√2. There for [tex]t\in]-\infty,\sqrt{2}[\subset\mathbb{R}[/tex] , and since T is a non empty set bounded from the top. Hence by the completeness axiom there exists an a in ℝ such that a=Sup(T).

b) I have a feeling that I will have to use a proof by contradiction, but I don't know how to start.

c) I started this one with letting a and b be two upper bounds of T such that a≠b and let ε>0:

Let ε'=a-b>0 . Therefore there exists an x in T such that: a-ε'<x. Therefore, after substituting ε' with its value we get that there exists an x in T such that b<x. Hence we reach a contradiction with b being an upper bound of T therefore b<a. And finally a=Sup(T)

d) Well from b) we have that a^2<2 is a false statement and from c) we found that a^2>2 contradicts with a=Sup(T), which leaves us with a^2=2 and therefore a=Sup(T).

Thank you for your help in advanced.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) Ok we have [tex]t^{2}<2[/tex] which implies t<√2. There for [tex]t\in]-\infty,\sqrt{2}[\subset\mathbb{R}[/tex] , and since T is a non empty set bounded from the top. Hence by the completeness axiom there exists an a in ℝ such that a=Sup(T).
OK, although you could have worded it better. Your claim is that ##T## is a nonempty set bounded from above. So give an example of an element in ##T##, and give an explicit upper bound. You provided ##\sqrt{2}## as an upper bound, and while it's "obvious" that this is correct, a line or two to prove it would be a good idea.

b) I have a feeling that I will have to use a proof by contradiction, but I don't know how to start.
If ##a^2 < 2##, can you find an element of ##T## which is greater than ##a##?

c) I started this one with letting a and b be two upper bounds of T such that a≠b and let ε>0:

Let ε'=a-b>0 .
I don't see how ##a-b > 0## follows from your assumption.

d) Well from b) we have that a^2<2 is a false statement and from c) we found that a^2>2 contradicts with a=Sup(T), which leaves us with a^2=2 and therefore a=Sup(T).
The conclusion is that ##a^2 = 2##. You already defined ##a = \sup(T)## in part (a), so there's no "therefore" about it.
 
mtayab1994 said:

Homework Statement


Let T be a set such that:
[tex]T=\{t\in\mathbb{R}/t^{2}<2\}[/tex]


Homework Equations



a) Justify the existence of a real number a such that a=Sup(T)

b) Prove that the proposition [tex]a^{2}<2[/tex] is false.

c) Suppose that [tex]a^{2}>2[/tex]. Prove that we can find a contradiction with a=Sup(T).

d) Conclude that finally [tex]a^{2}=2[/tex]



The Attempt at a Solution



a) Ok we have [tex]t^{2}<2[/tex] which implies t<√2.

This is putting the cart before the horse: the object of the question is to prove that there actually exists a positive real number [itex]a[/itex] such that [itex]a^2 = 2[/itex].
 
jbunniii said:
OK, although you could have worded it better. Your claim is that ##T## is a nonempty set bounded from above. So give an example of an element in ##T##, and give an explicit upper bound. You provided ##\sqrt{2}## as an upper bound, and while it's "obvious" that this is correct, a line or two to prove it would be a good idea.


If ##a^2 < 2##, can you find an element of ##T## which is greater than ##a##?


I don't see how ##a-b > 0## follows from your assumption.


The conclusion is that ##a^2 = 2##. You already defined ##a = \sup(T)## in part (a), so there's no "therefore" about it.

B) No there is no element in T that's greater than a since a is the sup(T). Is that all?
 
mtayab1994 said:
B) No there is no element in T that's greater than a since a is the sup(T). Is that all?
Let me rephrase the question. Suppose ##a^2 < 2##. Can you find a number ##t \in T## such that ##t > a##, and therefore ##a## cannot be the supremum of ##T##?
 
jbunniii said:
Let me rephrase the question. Suppose ##a^2 < 2##. Can you find a number ##t \in T## such that ##t > a##, and therefore ##a## cannot be the supremum of ##T##?

Supposing that a^2<0 and that b is an upper bound of T. We want to prove that a<b.

So by proof by contradiction we suppose that b<a and let ε=a-b>0. So by definition there exists an x in T such that a-ε<x. By substituting ε with it's value we get that b<x , and that contradicts with our assumption of a<b (b is an upper bound). Finally a^2<2 is false and a=sup(T). Is this ok now?
 
mtayab1994 said:
Supposing that a^2<0 and that b is an upper bound of T. We want to prove that a<b.
I think you mean ##a^2 < 2##.

So by proof by contradiction we suppose that b<a and let ε=a-b>0. So by definition there exists an x in T such that a-ε<x. By substituting ε with it's value we get that b<x , and that contradicts with our assumption of a<b (b is an upper bound). Finally a^2<2 is false and a=sup(T). Is this ok now?
I don't see where you used the assumption that ##a^2 < 2##.

I don't think you want to introduce ##b## as an upper bound of ##T##. Try this instead: Suppose that ##a## is any real number such that ##a^2 < 2##. Then I claim that there is some ##t \in T## (not necessarily an upper bound of ##T##) such that ##a < t##. Therefore ##a## is not even an upper bound of ##T##, so it cannot be the supremum of ##T##. All you need to do is prove the claim.
 
jbunniii said:
I think you mean ##a^2 < 2##.


I don't see where you used the assumption that ##a^2 < 2##.

I don't think you want to introduce ##b## as an upper bound of ##T##. Try this instead: Suppose that ##a## is any real number such that ##a^2 < 2##. Then I claim that there is some ##t \in T## (not necessarily an upper bound of ##T##) such that ##a < t##. Therefore ##a## is not even an upper bound of ##T##, so it cannot be the supremum of ##T##. All you need to do is prove the claim.

Ok so I let there be two elements of T (a and t) such that a≠t, and we want to prove that a<t<2.

So with a proof by contradiction we'll say that t<a<2 and let ε=t-a>0. When we plug in ε to the previous inequality we get that ε+a<a⇔ ε<0 which contradicts with it being greater than 0. I'm pretty sure this isn't it though.
 
mtayab1994 said:
Ok so I let there be two elements of T (a and t) such that a≠t, and we want to prove that a<t<2.
No, first of all, you want ##a < t < \sqrt{2}##, not ##a < t < 2##. And you can't "let there be" two such elements. Start with an element ##a \in T## (i.e. ##a^2 < 2##). You want to prove that there EXISTS an element ##t\in T## such that ##a < t##.
 
  • #10
Hint: if ##a^2 < 2##, then there exists a rational number of the form ##p^2/q^2## such that ##a^2 < p^2/q^2 < 2##. (Why?)
 
  • #11
jbunniii said:
Hint: if ##a^2 < 2##, then there exists a rational number of the form ##p^2/q^2## such that ##a^2 < p^2/q^2 < 2##. (Why?)

Well like you said and if we have p and q two co-prime integers then when we square root them we get: a<p/q<√2 and multiply by q and we get aq<p<q*√2. I was thinking that's going to say that p isn't an integer but you can't say from what I've reached.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
920
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K