What Is the Tension in a String During Simple Harmonic Motion?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a mass suspended from a string undergoing simple harmonic motion, specifically analyzing the tension in the string at various points in its swing. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, including forces, tension, and energy conservation.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the use of conservation of energy to determine the speed of the mass at the vertical position. There is also an attempt to calculate the tension in the string at different angles, with some questioning the application of trigonometric functions in their calculations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering insights into the forces acting on the mass and the relationships between tension and gravitational force. Some have provided guidance on how to approach the tension calculations, while others are clarifying their understanding of the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion regarding the application of sine and cosine in the context of forces acting on the mass. Participants are also reflecting on their understanding of circular motion and centripetal acceleration, indicating a need for further exploration of these concepts.

QuarkCharmer
Messages
1,049
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


a 0.12kg mass is suspended on a magic string with no mass, and length of 0.80m. There is no air resistance, and the pendulum is swinging such that it makes a maximum angle of 45 degrees with the vertical.

A.) What's the speed as it passes the vertical position?
B.) What is the tension in the string when it makes an angle of 45 with the vertical?
C.) What is the tension in the string as it passes through the vertical?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


A.) I simply used the conservation of energy to determine it's velocity at the bottom:
[tex]mgh = \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}[/tex]
[tex]gh = \frac{1}{2}v^{2}[/tex] //masses cancel
[tex]\sqrt{2(9.8)h} = v[/tex]

[itex]h = (.80)-(.80)cos(45)[/itex]

[tex]\sqrt{2(9.8)((.80)-(.80)cos(45))} = v[/tex]
[tex]v=2.1 m/s[/tex]

B.) Here is what I tried:
3531mwp.jpg

[tex]T = \frac{mg}{cos(45)}[/tex]
[tex]T = \frac{(0.12)(9.8)}{cos(45)}[/tex]
[tex]T = 1.66 N[/tex]
Which is wrong for some reason. I believe the solution to be mgsin(45) but I don't understand why?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The tension points toward the hinge. Gravity can be decomposed into components parallel with the string and perpendicular to it.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • pendulum.JPG
    pendulum.JPG
    9.9 KB · Views: 736
Aren't I only concerned with the red vectors in this image? Since the mass has reached it's max height and velocity/acceleration are zero at this point. I figured that there must be another vector canceling out the green mgcos(45), leaving only the red mgcos(45) to be equal to the tension as per Newton's third?

mikhlg.jpg


I'm still not seeing where a sine comes into play here.
 
You drew the tension in the wrong way in the first figure. At the top of the pendulum's trajectory, the velocity is 0, and so is the force in the direction along the string. You must balance the tension and the gravitational force (projected into that direction).
 
Matterwave said:
You drew the tension in the wrong way in the first figure. At the top of the pendulum's trajectory, the velocity is 0, and so is the force in the direction along the string. You must balance the tension and the gravitational force (projected into that direction).

I drew it that way because it would be equal to the vector in the direction of the string that represents tension.
 
What I'm saying is...T and mg do not make two legs of a triangle like in that figure, I think that's why you're getting confused and writing cos(45)=mg/T or something like that.
 
QuarkCharmer said:
Aren't I only concerned with the red vectors in this image? Since the mass has reached it's max height and velocity/acceleration are zero at this point.
The velocity is zero, but the acceleration is not. The component of gravity which is normal to the string accelerates the body, while the tension is equal to the parallel component of gravity (as the centripetal force is zero).

ehild
 
I see my previous problem, I don't know what I was thinking!

Now I am attempting to find the Tension on the string through the vertical (zero degrees).

I was thinking that since mg pulls down on the mass, T pulls up, and there are no other forces in the y direction, that the solution would simply be mg.

But, to get the right solution I applied F=ma and substituted in v^2/r for a, giving me..
[tex]T-mg = m\frac{v^{2}}{L}[/tex]
Which produced the correct answer, but it is just really non intuitive how acceleration works in circular motion (a section we briefly discussed but did no actual problems on so I am going to go back and do problems there in more detail). What is the idea with this thinking?
 
2
QuarkCharmer said:
I was thinking that since mg pulls down on the mass, T pulls up, and there are no other forces in the y direction, that the solution would simply be mg.

But, to get the right solution I applied F=ma and substituted in v^2/r for a, giving me..
[tex]T-mg = m\frac{v^{2}}{L}[/tex]
Which produced the correct answer, but it is just really non intuitive how acceleration works in circular motion (a section we briefly discussed but did no actual problems on so I am going to go back and do problems there in more detail). What is the idea with this thinking?

The object moves along a circle of given radius R(=L) and speed v. That can only be if an appropriate centripetal force acts on it pointing to the centre. The radial components of all forces have to sum up to give the centripetal force:

∑Fr=mv2/R

As the direction of the velocity changes when moving along a circle, there is acceleration towards the centre (see this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fSfVVz0eIis:) It is called the centripetal acceleration acp and iacp= v2R. You will learn how to derive this expression.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K