What is the term for a set of loci that are the same?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter swampwiz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Set Term
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The term for a set of loci that are the same is "congruent." In the discussion, two parametric lines are presented: s0(t) = <2, 1>t + <0, -3> and s1(t) = <-18, -9>t + <-6, -6>. Both lines describe the same geometric line, despite differing parameterizations. The equations are equivalent, as they represent the same set of points in space, demonstrating that any scalar multiple of a direction vector retains the same direction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parametric equations in geometry
  • Familiarity with vector representation and scalar multiplication
  • Knowledge of slope-intercept form of linear equations
  • Basic concepts of congruence in geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Parametric equations in geometry" for deeper insights
  • Study "Vector operations and their applications" to understand direction vectors
  • Explore "Slope-intercept form and its transformations" for alternative representations of lines
  • Investigate "Congruence and equivalence in geometry" to grasp related concepts
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the relationships between parametric equations and their geometric representations.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
I'm thinking the term is congruent.

For example, let's say there are 2 parametric lines:

s0( t ) = < 2 , 1 > t + < 0 , - 3 >

s1( t ) = < -18 , -9 > t + < -6 , -6 >

The loci for both are the same line, just that one proceeds in the opposite as the other (and at a high rate) per change in parameter, and such that

s1( - t ) = s0( 9 t + 3 )

Surely, there must be a term for this.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
'The loci are identical' is the way I would express it.
 
swampwiz said:
For example, let's say there are 2 parametric lines
s0( t ) = < 2 , 1 > t + < 0 , - 3 >

s1( t ) = < -18 , -9 > t + < -6 , -6 >
I would say that the equations are equivalent, as both parametric equations describe the same set of points.

For your parametric line, there are an infinite number of parametric representations. For example, the direction along your line is given by the vector <2, 1>. Any scalar multiple of this vector will also have the same direction. In your second equation the direction vector is <-18, -9>, which is -9 * <2, 1>.
Also, the equation could be written using any point on the line.

In slope intercept form, the equation of the line is y = (1/2) x - 3, which could also be written as 2y - x + 6 = 0, and in many other ways as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K