What is the terminal speed and acceleration of spheres falling through liquid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter furor celtica
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Motion
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the dynamics of two spheres falling through a liquid, focusing on the forces acting on them, including weight, buoyancy, and liquid resistance. The spheres, with different masses but the same radius, are analyzed for their terminal speeds and the time taken to reach the bottom of a 10-meter deep liquid.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of terminal velocities and the implications of varying acceleration as the spheres fall. There are discussions on the use of kinematic equations and the assumptions made regarding constant acceleration versus variable acceleration.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning the methods used for calculating time intervals and terminal velocities. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of acceleration and the application of formulas, but there is no explicit consensus on the approach to take for estimating time intervals.

Contextual Notes

There are uncertainties regarding the assumptions made about the acceleration of the spheres and the interpretation of the problem statement, particularly concerning the time taken to reach terminal velocity and the bottom of the liquid.

furor celtica
Messages
69
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When an object falls through a liquid, three forces act on it: its weight, the buoyancy and the resistance of the liquid. Two spheres, of mass 0.5 kg and 1.5 kg respectively, have the same radius, so that they have the same buoyancy of 3.2 Newtons, and the same resistance formula, 5v Newtons when falling at speed v ms^-1. Both spheres enter the liquid falling vertically at 1 ms^-1. Calculate the terminal speeds of the two spheres, and the acceleration or deceleration when they enter the liquid.
(Here I found: for mass 0.5 kg, terminal speed 0.36 ms^1 and acceleration -6.4 ms^2; for mass 1.5 kg, terminal speed 2.36, acceleration 4.53 (to 3 s.f.))
If the depth of the liquid is 10m, show that the heavier sphere reaches the bottom after a time between 4 and 10 seconds. Find bounds for the time that the lighter sphere takes to reach the bottom.

Homework Equations



Ok to starting with the heavier sphere I thought it would be logical to proceed like this:
To find higher bound: distance = 10, u=1, v<2.36, a= (15 – 3.2 – 5v)/1.5 = (11.8 -5v)/1.5, equation s=ut + 0.5at^2, find v in terms of t and find interval for which v<2.36 is true

The Attempt at a Solution



No problem here, I found t<10
I used a similar method to find the lower bound using s=vt-0.5at^2 and v=1, u>1, but this time the expression had no real roots, so I’m wondering if I’m not using the wrong method altogether, and if my first result was just lucky.
Can someone show me how to work through this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, furor!

I think that lower bound on the time is just how long it takes if it is assumed it goes at the terminal velocity for the whole 10 meters.

Your a= (15 – 3.2 – 5v)/1.5 from the F = ma law looks good, though I didn't get a nice even 15.
Anyway, the question is how you can find the terminal velocity with this. What is the acceleration when the terminal velocity is reached? Plug that in, and you've got it!

Careful with s=ut + 0.5at^2; must keep in mind that the acceleration is not constant so this formula doesn't apply, except perhaps in estimating an upper or lower bound.
 
but i already have the terminal velocity, i need the time interval.
how can i find this without the constant acceleration formulae? if i can't use s=ut + 0.5at^2 then all my working is useless anyway, including my apprently correct t<10 result.
can you please explain more, thanks for your help btw this is the only forum where somebody has tried to help me with this question
 
(Here I found: for mass 0.5 kg, terminal speed 0.36 ms^1 and acceleration -6.4 ms^2; for mass 1.5 kg, terminal speed 2.36, acceleration 4.53 (to 3 s.f.))

Will you please show me how you calculated the terminal velocity and acceleration?
When the balls enter the water, there initial velocity before entering the water is 1 m/s and there acceleration is g. Inside the water there velocity increases with variable acceleration until they attain the terminal velocity. Duration to attain the terminal velocity by the two spheres is different and hence the time taken by them to reach the bottom is different.
And can you explain this?
If the depth of the liquid is 10m, show that the heavier sphere reaches the bottom after a time between 4 and 10 seconds.
Do they mean 4 s to reach the terminal velocity and 10 s to reach the bottom?
 
i don't know what they mean by this exactly, maybe they mean find the times taking u=1 and v=terminal speed, i really don't know, that's what i took it to be
about the accelerations and terminal velocities i checked them already, its all good
 
I can understand the calculation of the terminal velocities. But I am unable to understand the positive and negative acceleration.
 
(Here I found: for mass 0.5 kg, terminal speed 0.36 ms^1 and acceleration -6.4 ms^2; for mass 1.5 kg, terminal speed 2.36, acceleration 4.53 (to 3 s.f.))
So the speed is > 2.36. Therefore the time to fall is < 10/2.36 = 4.2 s or approximately 4 s since this is just an estimate.
Also you have that the average speed is < 1 so time to fall is > 10/1. This is as good as you can do without the formulas for motion with varying acceleration - have to save that for next year I think!

BTW, rounding g*1.5 = 14.7 to 15 has left the calcs with only 2 digit accuracy.
 
ok i get it now its al ot simpler than i thought, just using constant velocity over 10 m with values u=1 and v=terminal velocity, am i right?
thanks for your time
 
Right, just a crude, rough estimate until you can find it accurately with calculus next year. Most welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K