What is the vacuum at the Karman line?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mesa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The vacuum at the Karman line, located at 100 km altitude, is approximately 2.4 x 10-4 Torr, according to a calculator linked in the discussion. However, other sources indicate a pressure range between 1.09 and 0.0075 Torr. The consensus among participants suggests that the pressure at this altitude is around 0.03 Pa or 2 x 10-4 Torr. Discrepancies in data highlight the need for reliable calculators that accommodate high altitudes accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atmospheric pressure and vacuum concepts
  • Familiarity with pressure units such as Torr and Pascal (Pa)
  • Knowledge of altitude effects on pressure
  • Basic proficiency in interpreting scientific charts and graphs
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Torr and Pascal (Pa) as pressure units
  • Explore the physics of atmospheric pressure at varying altitudes
  • Investigate reliable calculators for vacuum measurements at high altitudes
  • Learn about the Karman line and its significance in aerospace engineering
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, atmospheric scientists, students studying physics, and anyone interested in high-altitude pressure measurements will benefit from this discussion.

mesa
Gold Member
Messages
694
Reaction score
36
Hey guys, what is the vacuum at the Karman line (100km straight up).

I found conflicting sources on this. Wikipedia links to a calculator that states it is ~2.4*10^(-4)T, while another chart I found says it is in between 1.09 and .0075 Torr:

http://www.orbitec.com/documents/Orbitec_Vacuum_Reference.pdf

I always thought it was around 10^(-3)T.

Any help would be appreciated!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That calculator is massively wrong for high altitudes, the other two calculators linked here don't allow those heights.

Going by this chart, pressure is 0.03 Pa or 2*10-4 torr.
Note that the graph agrees well with the "mm Hg" and kg/(sq cm) columns for 45 km and 200 km. The torr entry in the 200 km row seems to be wrong, it does not agree with mm Hg column.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
21K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K