What is the value of n in 8x^2+4x+n if the expression has real roots?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the value of n in the quadratic expression 8x² + 4x + n such that the expression has real roots. Participants explore the concept of the discriminant and its implications for the roots of the quadratic equation.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants mention that for a quadratic to have real roots, the discriminant must be non-negative, expressed as b² - 4ac ≥ 0.
  • There is a discussion about applying the discriminant condition to the specific quadratic 8x² + 4x + n, with participants suggesting to substitute a = 8, b = 4, and c = n into the discriminant formula.
  • Participants clarify that if the discriminant equals zero, the quadratic has a repeated root, while a positive discriminant indicates two distinct roots.
  • Graphical interpretations are provided, explaining how the discriminant affects the behavior of the parabola in relation to the x-axis.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of the discriminant for determining the nature of the roots of the quadratic. However, the specific value of n that satisfies the condition for real roots remains unresolved, as no calculations or conclusions are presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not include specific calculations or the final value of n, leaving the mathematical steps and assumptions implicit.

mathdad
Messages
1,280
Reaction score
0
If the expression 8x^2+4x+n has real roots, find the value of n.

Can someone get me started? I found this question online and find it interesting.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider the general quadratic:

$$ax^2+bx+c$$

If this quadratic is to have real roots, then the discriminant has to be non-negative, that is:

$$b^2-4ac\ge0$$

What do you get when you apply this rule to the quadratic you posted?
 
MarkFL said:
Consider the general quadratic:

$$ax^2+bx+c$$

If this quadratic is to have real roots, then the discriminant has to be non-negative, that is:

$$b^2-4ac\ge0$$

What do you get when you apply this rule to the quadratic you posted?

Are you talking about the discriminant?
 
RTCNTC said:
Are you talking about the discriminant?

Yes, the discriminant is what's under the radical in the quadratic formula, and it cannot be negative if the roots ore real. :D
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, the discriminant is what's under the radical in the quadratic formula, and it cannot be negative if the roots ore real. :D

I plug a = 8, b = 4 and c = n into b^2 - 4ac and equate to 0, right?
 
RTCNTC said:
I plug a = 8, b = 4 and c = n into b^2 - 4ac and equate to 0, right?

You want to set the discriminant greater than or equal to zero, since you don't want it to be negative. If the discriminant is equal to zero, then you will have a repeated root, or a root of multiplicity 2. If the discriminant is greater than zero, then you will have two distinct roots.

To put this in graphical terms, when the discriminant is zero, then the parabola will be tangent to the $x$-axis, that is, the parabola will only touch the $x$-axis at one point. If the discriminant is greater than zero, then the parabola will cross the $x$-axis at two points, and if the discriminant is negative then the parabola will not touch the $x$-axis at all.
 
MarkFL said:
You want to set the discriminant greater than or equal to zero, since you don't want it to be negative. If the discriminant is equal to zero, then you will have a repeated root, or a root of multiplicity 2. If the discriminant is greater than zero, then you will have two distinct roots.

To put this in graphical terms, when the discriminant is zero, then the parabola will be tangent to the $x$-axis, that is, the parabola will only touch the $x$-axis at one point. If the discriminant is greater than zero, then the parabola will cross the $x$-axis at two points, and if the discriminant is negative then the parabola will not touch the $x$-axis at all.

I totally get it. Interesting question.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K