Measuring the Volume of a Cup: A Scientific Analysis

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cp3themvp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The volume of a cup can be measured using two distinct methods: submerging the cup in water to determine the volume of the material that forms the cup, or filling the cup to the brim with water to measure the volume it can hold. The first method accurately measures the physical space occupied by the cup's material, while the second method includes the volume of air if the cup is not fully submerged. Clarity in definitions is crucial, as the term "volume of the cup" can refer to either the material volume or the fluid capacity. This discussion emphasizes the importance of specifying which volume is being measured to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic scientific principles of volume measurement
  • Familiarity with graduated cylinders and their use in experiments
  • Knowledge of Archimedes' principle and its application in fluid displacement
  • Ability to distinguish between different definitions of volume (material vs. capacity)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Archimedes' principle and its historical significance in volume measurement
  • Explore methods for accurately measuring fluid displacement in graduated cylinders
  • Learn about the differences between material volume and capacity volume in scientific contexts
  • Investigate practical applications of volume measurement in engineering and design
USEFUL FOR

Students, educators, and professionals in scientific fields, particularly those involved in physics, engineering, and materials science, will benefit from understanding the nuances of volume measurement discussed here.

cp3themvp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I submerge a cup in a graduated cylinder filled with water, will the change of the water line show me the volume of the cup? Or is this not the case?

I am in an argument with a friend, he believes that the volume of the cup could be found by holding the top of the cup right about the water line(in other words, not allowing any water to enter to the cup) and then measuring the change of the water line. I argued that if one uses this method of measurement, that the change in the water line now includes the volume of the air that is inside of the cup.

The scientific definition of volume I found is the amount of space an object takes up. In the 1st experiment I proposed, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up. In the 2nd experiment, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up+the amount of space the air inside of the cup takes up. Am I correct, or is the 2nd experiment actually the correct method for measuring the volume of a cup?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right, drown the cup. There is a famous story about this experiment:
http://www.longlongtimeago.com/once-upon-a-time/great-discoveries/eureka-the-story-of-archimedes-and-the-golden-crown/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
cp3themvp said:
I am in an argument with a friend, he believes that the volume of the cup could be found by holding the top of the cup right about the water line(in other words, not allowing any water to enter to the cup) and then measuring the change of the water line. I argued that if one uses this method of measurement, that the change in the water line now includes the volume of the air that is inside of the cup.

The scientific definition of volume I found is the amount of space an object takes up. In the 1st experiment I proposed, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up. In the 2nd experiment, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up+the amount of space the air inside of the cup takes up. Am I correct, or is the 2nd experiment actually the correct method for measuring the volume of a cup?

This is an issue of wording. By 'volume of the cup' do you two mean the volume of fluid that the cup can hold? Or do you mean the volume of the material composing the cup? The former would require that you just fill the cup with fluid and pour it into a graduated cylinder. The latter is found by submerging the entire cup, not just submerge it until the water reaches the rim.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
cp3themvp said:
The scientific definition of volume...
Don't waste your time on arguing about definitions. Just clarify which volume you both mean and use qualifiers to distinguish them. It depends on the application which volume is the relevant one.
 
cp3themvp said:
If I submerge a cup in a graduated cylinder filled with water, will the change of the water line show me the volume of the cup? Or is this not the case?

I am in an argument with a friend, he believes that the volume of the cup could be found by holding the top of the cup right about the water line(in other words, not allowing any water to enter to the cup) and then measuring the change of the water line. I argued that if one uses this method of measurement, that the change in the water line now includes the volume of the air that is inside of the cup.

The scientific definition of volume I found is the amount of space an object takes up. In the 1st experiment I proposed, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up. In the 2nd experiment, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up+the amount of space the air inside of the cup takes up. Am I correct, or is the 2nd experiment actually the correct method for measuring the volume of a cup?

This can easily be clarified by specifying if you want the volume of the MATERIAL that forms the cup, or do you want the volume that the cup can hold.

These are two different definitions and give two different volumes.

By submerging the cup in water and making sure that there are no air pockets, you are measuring the volume of material that forms the cup. By filling the cup up to the brim with water and then measuring that volume of water, you are measuring the volume that the cup can hold.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
This can easily be clarified by specifying if you want the volume of the MATERIAL that forms the cup, or do you want the volume that the cup can hold.
I think the method suggested by the OP's friend is a third variant: the sum of the two volumes above. This would be relevant if you plan to use the cup as a boat, and want know its maximal displacement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
8K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
584