What Is the Weight of a Block on an Inclined Plane?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AnkhUNC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the weight of a block on an inclined plane, with specific values provided for mass, angle, and an external force. Participants explore the relationships between forces acting on the block and the normal force in the context of static equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of the normal force and question the assumptions regarding motion and friction. There are attempts to apply Newton's laws and free body diagrams to analyze the forces acting on the block.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various interpretations of the problem setup, with some participants providing guidance on how to approach the analysis of forces. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the block being stationary and the relationship between the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their calculations and the assumptions made regarding friction. The problem appears to be designed to encourage critical thinking about the forces at play rather than to yield a definitive answer.

AnkhUNC
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Weight/Normal Force of a block

Homework Statement



If P = 1.98, M = 1, Theta = 45 degrees what is the weight of m in Newtons?

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/3339/fig450ph7.gif

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm apparently doing this wrong. I was trying to solve for the normal force given that N = Mg/cos theta but this is just 9.8 so I'm doing something wrong. Any advice would be appreciated.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any further description of the problem? Is the block sliding down the incline?
 
P (1.98) is such that the block is not moving.

Thats all I'm given :(
 
Start by identifying the forces acting on each mass. Draw a free body diagram for each.

What can you say about the net force on the block?
 
AnkhUNC said:
I was trying to solve for the normal force given that N = Mg/cos theta ...
How did you deduce this?
 
N cosθ – mg = ma(y). a(y) = 0 so N = Mg/cos theta?

Forces on triangle block are W (Mass pointed down), P (->), Normal force up mgcos(theta) opposite the angle of the block?

Small block is w pointed straight down and Normal force at an angle opposite (90d?)
 
AnkhUNC said:
N cosθ – mg = ma(y). a(y) = 0 so N = Mg/cos theta?
Good. But don't mix M and m: N = mg/cos(theta).
Forces on triangle block are W (Mass pointed down), P (->), Normal force up mgcos(theta) opposite the angle of the block?
Only worry about horizontal forces on the triangle.
Small block is w pointed straight down and Normal force at an angle opposite (90d?)
OK

Keep going. Apply Newton's 2nd law to the horizontal direction and see what you can deduce. Hint: What net horizontal force acts on the block? On both masses?
 
P = (M + m) g tanθ?

But this gives me m = .2020408163 so * 9.8 just = 1.98 again which is wrong.

N = Nx i + Ny j = N sinθ i + N cosθ j

–Nsinθ = –mgtanθ

P – mg tanθ = Max

N sinθ = mg tanθ = max

P = (M + m) g tanθ I guess I'm just having a hard time seeing what I need to get out of this.

F = Mgcos(45) - mgsin(45)? That doesn't even look right...
 
AnkhUNC said:
P = (M + m) g tanθ?
No. Just apply Newton's 2nd law to M + m. (Where did you get the g tanθ?)

After you do that, apply it to the block alone.
 
  • #10
Ah its equal to 1! Sweet! I don't know if I did it right or not though. I did N = Mg/cos(45) to find N then N = mg/sin(45) so m = 1!
 
  • #11
AnkhUNC said:
P = (M + m) g tanθ?
Actually, I take it back. This seems correct to me. (I just didn't see how you got. You gave your conclusion first. :wink:)

But your data doesn't seem OK.
But this gives me m = .2020408163 so * 9.8 just = 1.98 again which is wrong.
I don't see how you deduced this value for m.
 
  • #12
AnkhUNC said:
Ah its equal to 1! Sweet! I don't know if I did it right or not though. I did N = Mg/cos(45) to find N then N = mg/sin(45) so m = 1!
Where did you get N = Mg/cos(45) = mg/sin(45)? I thought we had established that N = mg/cos(45).
 
  • #13
I was just trying to find a value for N without having m. Like I said I got the right answer but I'm sure I did it wrong
 
  • #14
What makes you think you got the right answer?
 
  • #15
AnkhUNC said:
N cosθ – mg = ma(y). a(y) = 0 so N = Mg/cos theta?

Hi AnkhUNC! :smile:

waaah … you've left out the y-component of the poor little friction force. :cry:

When you draw a diagram, you should always mark in all the forces

You need to take components in the normal direction, so that the friction component will be 0.

Then N = ? :smile:
 
  • #16
tiny-tim said:
..the poor little friction force. :cry:
Don't cry, tiny-tim! Now I'm starting to cry... :cry:

I would assume, lacking any statement to the contrary, that the surfaces are frictionless.
 
  • #17
The answer checked as right but like I said I was sure I did it wrong. If its not moving then N is going to be equal to P?

Any websites you can recommend to help with these types of problems? :(
 
  • #18
How about the site you're on right now? :wink:

Just attack it systematically, as I suggest in post #7. (I assume the surfaces are frictionless, correct?)

(I'd say that given the data you supplied, there is no correct answer. But you can solve for m symbolically in terms of P and M.)
 
  • #19
Yeah there isn't a frictional force. I think the problem was just to get me thinking about the process and I spent way too much time on it :P
 
  • #20
Just do it step by step. Analyze the forces and apply Newton's 2nd law:
(1) To the block (vertical direction)
(2) To the block (horizontal direction)
(3) To the entire system (horizontal direction)
 
  • #21
Doc Al said:
Don't cry, tiny-tim! Now I'm starting to cry... :cry:

I would assume, lacking any statement to the contrary, that the surfaces are frictionless.

Yes, looking at the diagram again, I think you're right!

Presumably the whole system is accelerating, but the little block is not moving relative to the big block, so resolving vertically was correct after all. :redface:

oh … I'm so much more cheerful now!

Thanks, Doc Al! :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
334
Replies
22
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
911
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K