What is wrong with my reasoning here?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mpatryluk
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on a misunderstanding regarding squaring and square roots in mathematics. When squaring a negative number, the result is positive, but taking the square root of a positive number yields both a positive and a negative solution (x = ±5). The squaring function is not one-to-one, meaning it does not have a unique inverse, which is why the square root of x² is the absolute value of x (|x|). It's important to clarify the context when dealing with physical problems, as negative solutions may not have practical significance. Understanding these concepts helps clarify the reasoning behind the operations involving squares and square roots.
mpatryluk
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I've just noticed that i have a fundamental lack of understanding in a specific aspect of math, and I can't find where my reasoning is flawed.

x = -5
x^2 = (-5)^2
x^2 = 25
x = 5

So in squaring the negative I remove it, and then when I root the number back to original magnitude, the negative has disappeared. What am I missing?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
when you square root a number, it can either be negative or positive because a negative times a negative is a positive, as well as a positive times a positive
(-1)(-1)=1=(1)(1)
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
mpatryluk said:
I've just noticed that i have a fundamental lack of understanding in a specific aspect of math, and I can't find where my reasoning is flawed.

x = -5
x^2 = (-5)^2
x^2 = 25
x = 5

So in squaring the negative I remove it, and then when I root the number back to original magnitude, the negative has disappeared. What am I missing?

If you are presented with ## x^2 = 25 ## and asked to take the square root, your answer would be ## x = \pm 5 ##.

If you are in some situation where you know the answer has to be positive or negative you would have to offer some clarification in writing (or explanation if you are demonstrating to someone). Sometimes, for example, in physical problems, you know you have a positive magnitude, so the negative answer might not have any physical meaning.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
dkotschessaa said:
If you are presented with ## x^2 = 25 ## and asked to take the square root, your answer would be ## x = \pm 5 ##.
Strictly speaking, no. If you were asked to solve the equation x^2= 25 then the answer would be x= \pm 5. But if you are asked to take the square root of 25, the answer is 5. The square root is a function and, by definition of "function", every function, f, has to have a unique value, f(x), for any given x.

The real difficulty is that the "squaring function", f(x)= x^2, is NOT "one-to-one" and so does not have a true "inverse". In particular, while it is always true that (\sqrt{x})^2= x, it is NOT always true that \sqrt{x^2}= x. What is true is that \sqrt{x^2}= |x|.

If you are in some situation where you know the answer has to be positive or negative you would have to offer some clarification in writing (or explanation if you are demonstrating to someone). Sometimes, for example, in physical problems, you know you have a positive magnitude, so the negative answer might not have any physical meaning.

-Dave K
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
What HallsOfIvy said is absolutely correct. In symbols, the three equations are the following:

$$ x = 5$$
$$ \Rightarrow x^2 = 5^2 = 25$$
$$\Leftrightarrow x = \pm 5$$

The squaring operation in the second equation is not one-to-one, and so not reversible, which is the reason for the "implies" one-way arrow. Another way to think of this is that the solution set of the first equation {5} is different from the solution set of the second equation, which is {5, -5}. The solution sets of the second and third equations are exactly the same, which is indication by the double-ended arrow.

The operations that are one-to-one, and hence reversible, are the arithmetic operations (add, subtract, multiply, divide - restricted to nonzero divisors), exponentiating (taking e to some power), taking the log, and so on.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K