- #1
brownman
- 13
- 0
If this were the reduced row echelon form of an augmented matrix,
1 2 0 1 1 0 3
0 0 1 2 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
What is the form of the following answer given, and how can I understand it?
(x1; x2; x3; x4; x5; x6) = (3; 0; 1; 0; 0; 2)+ t(1; 0; 1; 0; 1; 0)+ s(1; 0; 2; 1; 0; 0)+ u(2; 1; 0; 0; 0; 0)
for s; t; u [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ.
1 2 0 1 1 0 3
0 0 1 2 1 0 1
0 0 0 0 0 1 2
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
What is the form of the following answer given, and how can I understand it?
(x1; x2; x3; x4; x5; x6) = (3; 0; 1; 0; 0; 2)+ t(1; 0; 1; 0; 1; 0)+ s(1; 0; 2; 1; 0; 0)+ u(2; 1; 0; 0; 0; 0)
for s; t; u [itex]\in[/itex] ℝ.