A What kind of topology change does this Lorentzian metric describe?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the interpretation of a Lorentzian metric presented in a paper, specifically regarding its implications for spatial topology changes. Participants debate whether the metric describes a transition from connectedness to disconnectedness over time and question the unusual periodicity of time (t). Clarification is sought on which example of the metric is being referenced, with confusion arising over the identification of the first example. Ultimately, it is suggested that t=0 signifies a state of nothingness, while t=1 indicates the formation of an S^3 wormhole. The conversation highlights the complexities of understanding topology changes in the context of Lorentzian metrics.
Onyx
Messages
141
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
What kind of topology change does this Lorentzian metric describe?
Looking at this paper, what sort of spatial topology change does the lorentzian metric (the first one presented) describe? Does it describe the transition from spatial connectedness to disconnectedness with time? All I know is that there is some topology change involved, but I don’t see the paper specifying what kind. Also, why is ##t## periodic? That seems very unusual to me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which one do you call the first example? The one that says that it is Wheeler's beloved wormhole? Then it describes the change from nothing to a wormhole ##S^1\times S^2##.
 
No, when I say the first example, I mean number 7, the Lorentzian metric with the off-diagonal entries.
 
Onyx said:
No, when I say the first example, I mean number 7, the Lorentzian metric with the off-diagonal entries.
That is the same example!
 
martinbn said:
That is the same example!
Oh, my bad.
 
Onyx said:
Oh, my bad.
Well then I suppose ##t=0## represents nothing and ##t=1## represents the ##S^3## wormhole having formed.
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
837
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
892
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
7K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K