What makes a field theory relativistic?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In the discussion on relativistic field theories, it is established that both Classical Field Theory and Quantum Field Theory (QFT) require the Lagrangian to be Lorentz invariant for the fields to be classified as relativistic. However, the fields themselves, represented as complex-valued functions (φ or ψ), must be Lorentz covariant, meaning they can transform as vectors or one-forms but are not restricted to being scalars. This distinction is crucial for understanding how these fields behave under different reference frames.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lorentz invariance and covariance
  • Familiarity with Classical Field Theory concepts
  • Knowledge of Quantum Field Theory (QFT) principles
  • Basic grasp of complex-valued functions in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Lorentz covariance in Quantum Field Theory
  • Study the role of the Lagrangian in Classical Field Theory
  • Explore transformations of complex-valued fields in different reference frames
  • Learn about vector and one-form representations in relativistic physics
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, students of advanced physics, and anyone interested in the foundations of relativistic field theories.

LarryS
Gold Member
Messages
361
Reaction score
34
It is my understanding that in both Classical Field Theory and QFT the Lagrangian must be Lorentz invariant in order for the fields to be considered relativistic. Buy what about the field itself (φ or ψ)? As complex-valued functions of space and time do they also have to be Lorentz invariant?

As always, thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ftr
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming you understand Lorentz covariance (no problem if not, I'll explain).

They must be Lorentz covariant, but not necessarily Lorentz invariant, i.e. they can transform as a vector or a one-form but they don't have to be a scalar.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
referframe said:
As complex-valued functions of space and time

Do you mean how portability is affected by reference frame.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 182 ·
7
Replies
182
Views
16K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
10K