I What Milky Way stars could go supernova to < +3 at any time?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on which Milky Way stars could potentially go supernova and reach an apparent magnitude of +3 or brighter at their peak brightness. While Betelgeuse is often mentioned, other candidates like Sher 25 and Eta Carinae are highlighted as likely to explode soon. The conversation also touches on the capabilities of observatories to respond quickly to such events, noting that factors like distance and equipment availability play significant roles. Additionally, the Supernova Early Warning System is mentioned as a tool that could provide advance notice of a supernova, as demonstrated by the neutrinos detected from SN1987A. Overall, the thread emphasizes the uncertainty surrounding supernova predictions and the vast number of potential progenitor stars.
swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
(I use +3 as the cutoff as that seems to be the limit of easily visible stars.) Yes, I know that Betelgeuse could go up in a < -10 blaze of glory, but I wonder what other ones are out there.

On a side note, how fast could the big observatories move to it to observe it? And how quickly would it be noticed at all?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
physicshelp21 said:
There are many stars that are visible to the naked eye and have an apparent magnitude of +3 or brighter. Some examples include Sirius, Canopus, Alpha Centauri A and B, Vega, Capella, Arcturus, and Rigel. There are also many other stars that are visible to the naked eye but have an apparent magnitude fainter than +3.

Regarding your second question, the speed at which observatories could move to observe Betelgeuse depends on a number of factors, including the distance to the star, the location of the observatories, and the availability of suitable telescopes and other equipment. Betelgeuse is located approximately 642.5 light-years from Earth, which means that it would take a very long time for a spacecraft or other astronomical observatory to travel there.
I hope it helped.
I meant what stars could go as bright as +3 at the peak of their supernova, not current stars.

This weird answer sounds like it was generated by a bot.
 
swampwiz said:
This weird answer sounds like it was generated by a bot.
Some people think that's funny.

You're not going to get a list.

First, your magnitude is not constraining. SN1987a wasn't even in our galaxy and it was brighter than 3.

Next, there are thousands upon thousands of stars who are likely progenitors. If we get on average one SN every 30 years and could tell within 30,000 years when one was nearing the end (and we can't) that would be a thousand stars. Of these many thousands of stars, most don't have names, just catalog numbers, and some are obscured by dust and gas.

You want some possibilities: Sher 25 and Eta Carinae are likely to go "soon".
 
swampwiz said:
(I use +3 as the cutoff as that seems to be the limit of easily visible stars.) Yes, I know that Betelgeuse could go up in a < -10 blaze of glory, but I wonder what other ones are out there.

On a side note, how fast could the big observatories move to it to observe it? And how quickly would it be noticed at all?

https://snews2.org/

The Super Nova Early Warning System is designed to give electromagnetic telescopes a warning ahead of the supernova's light.

The principle was first demonstrated when neutrinos from supernova SN1987a preceded that explosion's light by two to three hours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN_1987A

Thanks,

Cerenkov.
 
"Pop III stars are thought to be composed entirely of helium and hydrogen with trace amounts of lithium, the ingredients left over after the Big Bang. They formed early on, around 200 million years after the universe began. These stars are extremely rare because they died out long ago, although scientists have hoped that the faint light from these distant, ancient objects would be detectable. Previous Population III candidates have been ruled out because they didn't meet the three main...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
33K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
132K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
7K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
9K