What Milky Way stars could go supernova to < +3 at any time?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the potential stars in the Milky Way that could reach an apparent magnitude of +3 during a supernova event. Notable candidates include Sher 25 and Eta Carinae, which are considered likely to explode "soon." The conversation also touches on the capabilities of observatories to respond to such events, highlighting the Supernova Early Warning System, which can provide alerts before the light from a supernova reaches Earth. The discussion emphasizes that while Betelgeuse is a well-known candidate, many other stars with catalog numbers are also potential progenitors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar evolution and supernova mechanisms
  • Familiarity with apparent magnitude and its significance in astronomy
  • Knowledge of the Supernova Early Warning System and its functionality
  • Awareness of notable stars in the Milky Way, such as Betelgeuse and Eta Carinae
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the characteristics and lifecycle of massive stars leading to supernovae
  • Explore the functionality and technology behind the Supernova Early Warning System
  • Investigate the historical context and significance of supernova SN1987A
  • Learn about the methods used to catalog and identify potential supernova progenitors
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and astronomy enthusiasts interested in stellar phenomena and supernova predictions will benefit from this discussion.

swampwiz
Messages
567
Reaction score
83
(I use +3 as the cutoff as that seems to be the limit of easily visible stars.) Yes, I know that Betelgeuse could go up in a < -10 blaze of glory, but I wonder what other ones are out there.

On a side note, how fast could the big observatories move to it to observe it? And how quickly would it be noticed at all?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
physicshelp21 said:
There are many stars that are visible to the naked eye and have an apparent magnitude of +3 or brighter. Some examples include Sirius, Canopus, Alpha Centauri A and B, Vega, Capella, Arcturus, and Rigel. There are also many other stars that are visible to the naked eye but have an apparent magnitude fainter than +3.

Regarding your second question, the speed at which observatories could move to observe Betelgeuse depends on a number of factors, including the distance to the star, the location of the observatories, and the availability of suitable telescopes and other equipment. Betelgeuse is located approximately 642.5 light-years from Earth, which means that it would take a very long time for a spacecraft or other astronomical observatory to travel there.
I hope it helped.
I meant what stars could go as bright as +3 at the peak of their supernova, not current stars.

This weird answer sounds like it was generated by a bot.
 
swampwiz said:
This weird answer sounds like it was generated by a bot.
Some people think that's funny.

You're not going to get a list.

First, your magnitude is not constraining. SN1987a wasn't even in our galaxy and it was brighter than 3.

Next, there are thousands upon thousands of stars who are likely progenitors. If we get on average one SN every 30 years and could tell within 30,000 years when one was nearing the end (and we can't) that would be a thousand stars. Of these many thousands of stars, most don't have names, just catalog numbers, and some are obscured by dust and gas.

You want some possibilities: Sher 25 and Eta Carinae are likely to go "soon".
 
swampwiz said:
(I use +3 as the cutoff as that seems to be the limit of easily visible stars.) Yes, I know that Betelgeuse could go up in a < -10 blaze of glory, but I wonder what other ones are out there.

On a side note, how fast could the big observatories move to it to observe it? And how quickly would it be noticed at all?

https://snews2.org/

The Super Nova Early Warning System is designed to give electromagnetic telescopes a warning ahead of the supernova's light.

The principle was first demonstrated when neutrinos from supernova SN1987a preceded that explosion's light by two to three hours.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SN_1987A

Thanks,

Cerenkov.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: swampwiz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
33K
  • · Replies 142 ·
5
Replies
142
Views
135K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K