What Mysteries Lie Beyond Planck Time After the Big Bang?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter HarryDaniels
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang Unknowns
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

This discussion centers around the nature of the universe immediately following the Big Bang, specifically the concept of Planck time and the behavior of fundamental forces during that epoch. Participants explore theoretical implications, the validity of physical laws, and the timeline of cosmic expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that at the moment of the Big Bang, the fundamental forces were unified into a single "superforce," with gravity separating first, though the exact timing of this separation is unclear.
  • One participant explains that Planck time (approximately 10^-44 seconds) is significant because it marks the point where quantum effects and gravitational effects become relevant, suggesting that the laws of physics may not apply in the same way during this time.
  • There is speculation that after Planck time, the universe was expanding, but the behavior of the universe during the Planck era remains uncertain, with no consensus on whether it was expanding, contracting, or stable.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about extrapolating current physical theories to the conditions of the early universe, particularly regarding energy densities beyond current experimental capabilities.
  • Some participants discuss the implications of Einstein's theories, noting that while nothing can travel faster than light, the expansion of space itself can lead to particles moving apart at effective speeds greater than light, which does not violate relativity.
  • There is a correction regarding the term "yontosecond," with a participant suggesting "yoctosecond" as the appropriate term for 10^-24 seconds.
  • One participant emphasizes that the massive expansion known as inflation occurred significantly later than Planck time, specifically after 10^-32 seconds.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of the universe at and after Planck time, with no clear consensus on the specifics of the forces involved or the applicability of physical laws during that period. There is acknowledgment of uncertainty and speculation regarding the early universe's conditions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on current theoretical frameworks, the unresolved nature of the physics at Planck time, and the challenges of extrapolating known physics to conditions that are not experimentally verified.

HarryDaniels
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
In the most recent theory I have heard, just in the first moments after the Big Bang strange things happened. I heard that there was not four fundamental forces, just one, or superforce. I also heard that the laws of physics did not apply.

How long was this time. As from research I have seen that the particles reached a lightyear in a second. According to Einstein, nothing can travel faster than light, so that law of physics did not apply at this point. But from other reading I have read that this "Planck time" only existed for perhaps a millionth of a yontosecond.

Can someone clear out the cobwebs for me.
Thanks
 
Space news on Phys.org
Correct, the forces of the universe were combined at the instant of the BB. Gravity is believed the first to separate. It is unclear when this happened. Apparently a fair amount of inflation occurred before gravity jumped in.
 
Thanks for your question Harry, I think I can answer it.

First off, the Planck time (around 10-44 sec) is the moment at which a particle's Compton wavelength (the scale at which quantum effects become important) becomes equivalent to the particle's Schwarzschild radius (the scale at which gravity becomes important). Therefore, it defines this moment when two important kinds of physics are both relevant, namely, quantum theory and general relativity. There is currently no known theory that successfully incorporates both quantum theory and general relativity, and so that's why you might hear people say that the "laws of physics do not apply here." However, it is widely believed that some theory applies here, it has just yet to be found.

However, current physical theories are capable of describing the universe after the Planck time. These theories are consistent with a universe in which 3 of the fundamental forces (electromagnetic, strong & weak nuclear) were unified into a single "superforce". It is conjectured that if we were to rewind the tape all the way back to the Planck time, gravity would join this "superforce" (and I suppose make it a super-superforce). However, whether this does (or even should) occur is not known.

Lastly -- your question about the expansion. Since we don't know the physics of the Planck era, we don't know how the universe was behaving -- we have no idea if it was expanding, contracting, or just sitting idly. However, after the Planck time, the universe was expanding. At this time, Einstein's special relativity is certainly applicable, and so we expect all particles to obey the speed limit v < c. Particles can't move a light year per second, so perhaps there was more to that story. What can happen, is that two particles can have relative velocities that surpass that of light.This is of course still troubling from the perspective of special relativity. However, everything is OK, and here's why: the particles themselves are at rest in space -- it is the space itself that is expanding, causing these particles to separate. There are no rules limiting the speed at which space itself can expand. In cosmology, we often see particles zipping apart from each other at speeds greater than that of light.
 
But I thought light was not relative.
Didn't Einstein say that if an object was going even a mps off the speed of light the speed of light would remain c distance away from the velocity of the second body. Light is not relative top anything, and is always C, regardless of the motion of the observer. I thought that was why it was called the universal constant as if it was relative it would never actually be at the speed C if the observers frame was important.
 
bapowell said:
However, current physical theories are capable of describing the universe after the Planck time. These theories are consistent with a universe in which 3 of the fundamental forces (electromagnetic, strong & weak nuclear) were unified into a single "superforce". It is conjectured that if we were to rewind the tape all the way back to the Planck time, gravity would join this "superforce" (and I suppose make it a super-superforce). However, whether this does (or even should) occur is not known.

I hope they won't call it a super-superforce :-)

Anyway, there is quite a bit of speculation involved when extrapolating the Standard Model from TeV scales up to the proposed GUT scale (not to mention the Planck scale). Much new physics can occur in that range that is not taken into account in this extrapolation.

I for one do not trust cosmological statements about how the universe evolved when its energy density was above the energies that we are currently able to probe. I'm not sure what time that was, though.

Torquil
 
Torquil,

You're absolutely right to be skeptical. Personally, I'm moved by the MSSM's unification of the coupling constants at around 1016 GeV. From a symmetry restoration perspective, I'm inclined to think that some form of unification occurred for the gauge forces. I'm not sold on gravity though...
 
HarryDaniels: in your original post you write: But from other reading I have read that this "Planck time" only existed for perhaps a millionth of a yontosecond.

I think you meant to say “yoctosecond”, which equals 10^-24 second.
 
The biggest part of expansion most likely occurred between t=0 and t= 10^-24
 
HarryDaniels said:
I heard that there was not four fundamental forces, just one, or superforce. I also heard that the laws of physics did not apply.

It's likely that some set of laws of physics did apply. We just aren't sure what they were.

According to Einstein, nothing can travel faster than light, so that law of physics did not apply at this point.

Einstein never said that nothing can travel faster than light. This rule is a simplification of what he actually did say.
 
  • #10
HarryDaniels said:
Didn't Einstein say that if an object was going even a mps off the speed of light the speed of light would remain c distance away from the velocity of the second body.

Yes. That's the basic rule. But that rule doesn't translate into "you can't have objects move away from each other at faster than the speed of light."
 
  • #11
One thing important point here is that the massive expansion of the universe (a.k.a inflation) happened quite a bit later than Planck's time. Planck's time is 10^-44 seconds, whereas inflation happened before 10^-32.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K