What should authors do when they realize their published idea is flawed?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Count Iblis
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 3K views
Count Iblis
Messages
1,859
Reaction score
8
http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0511544v3"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
...with an error in its proof.
 
neutrino said:
...with an error in its proof.
:biggrin:
 
Count Iblis said:
http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0511544v3"

What was this even about?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0511544v2"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
actually, i admire the author for being so forthright. mathematics is an exacting discipline, but in the less exacting disciplines (like science and engineering), you might think that this should happen more often.

some author publishes an idea that he/she later comes to the conclusion is crap. what's an author to do? follow the example of the Bogdanov brothers?