MHB What should I say about elementary number theory?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on preparing an engaging talk about elementary number theory, focusing on positive integers and primes, along with their applications in cryptography. A suggested hook for the introduction is the Chinese Remainder Theorem, which is highlighted for its appeal. Additionally, the concept of counting without direct enumeration is presented, with Burnside's Lemma mentioned as a relevant example. This lemma illustrates how to determine the number of distinct arrangements, such as colorings of beads, without tedious counting. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of captivating introductory concepts in presenting elementary number theory.
matqkks
Messages
280
Reaction score
5
I need to give an option talk about elementary number theory module. I will discuss how it is study of positive integers particularly the primes and give some cryptography applications. What is a good hook to stipulate in this talk regarding an introduction to elementary number theory?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Chinese Remainder Theorem - always fun. Counting things without actually counting them!
 
tkhunny said:
Chinese Remainder Theorem - always fun. Counting things without actually counting them!
I really like this. Are there any others?
 
matqkks said:
I really like this. Are there any others?

Counting things without actually counting them?
That brings Burnside's Lemma to mind.
It counts for instance the number of different colorings of a string of colored beads - without actually counting them.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top