What sparked the concept of baryon number in particle physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter guest1234
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Baryon Origin
Click For Summary
The concept of baryon number originated to explain the conservation of baryons in particle interactions, particularly in early beta decay experiments. It was introduced before the quark model, as a way to account for the absence of certain decay processes, like proton decay into leptons and mesons. Baryon number is conserved in all known experiments, and while it predates quarks, quark models incorporate this conservation principle. Researchers categorize particles, assigning baryon number +1 to matter and -1 to antimatter, while mesons are assigned a baryon number of zero due to their quark-antiquark composition. The discussion highlights the historical significance and continued relevance of baryon number in particle physics.
guest1234
Messages
38
Reaction score
1
I'm doing a little research on quarks on stumbled upon the baryon number. Wikipedia says that the notion predates the quark model. I have no clue why particle physicists were motivated to introduce it before flavour quantum numbers came to the scene.

So... What's the (historical) origin of baryon number?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Baryon number as a conserved quantity was to explain why you didn't see decays like p -> e+ pi0.
 
In all known experiments so far, the number of baryons is conserved, and the notion goes back to the early beta decay experiments. This has nothing to do with quarks, but most quark models incorporate baryon number conservation. Some extended symmetry theories predict proton decay into leptons and mesons which would violate baryon number conservation.
 
Well baryons were observed before the quark model and their behaviors documented.

One of the things researchers try is to sort things into groups and see what makes sense.

Doesn't it seem reasonable to count matter as +1 and antimatter as -1? Once you've done that for nucleons, and looked at what happens to the numbers in various nuclear reactions, what would be a sensible number to give mesons?
 
Where the quark model helps explain baryon number is motivating why baryon number of mesons is zero (quark/antiquark pair). Baryon number could be replaced with quark number, but everyone was used to baryon number.
 
Thanks everyone for your input! Got the type of answers I wanted.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
11K