MHB What Values of k Make These Vectors Linearly Dependent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Yankel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Vectors
Yankel
Messages
390
Reaction score
0
I have 4 vectors:

(1,1,1,k), (1,1,k,1), (1,k,1,1), (k,1,1,1)

I need to find out for which values of k (if any) the vectors will be dependent.

I put them all to a matrix, and reduced it using the Gaussian method (homogeneous system). I received:

1st row: 1 1 1 k 0

2nd row: 0 (k-1) 0 (1-k) 0

3rd: 0 0 (k-1) (1-k) 0

4th: 0 0 0 (-2k+3-x^2) 0the reduction is correct, I verified with MAPLE.

I am stuck here, MAPLE say the solution is (0,0,0,0), meaning that the vectors are independent, but on the other hand, when I do it manually, I think is has a solution, for example, the last equation is:

(-2k+3-x^2)*x4=0

it can be either when x4 is 0 or when k is 1 or -3. I am confused...(Worried) :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are x and x4?

When k=1 all the vectors are equal, so that's a solution.
When k=-3 the sum of the vectors is the null vector, so that's also a solution.
 
Last edited:
ah, sorry, confused x with k.

when k=1,-3 the system has infinite number of solutions, right ? so for these values the vectors are dependent...got it now, thanks !
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top