- 7,642
- 1,602
Another great has gone.
https://royalsociety.org/news/2019/...dent-of-the-royal-society-sir-michael-atiyah/
https://royalsociety.org/news/2019/...dent-of-the-royal-society-sir-michael-atiyah/
Sir Michael Atiyah's legacy is marked by his profound contributions to mathematical physics and his controversial proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, which he presented shortly before his passing. His proof reportedly relied on the elusive Todd function, the construction of which remains unclear. Despite skepticism regarding the validity of his proof, Atiyah's work continues to inspire and provoke discussion within the mathematical community. His influence is acknowledged by prominent figures such as Edward Witten and Roger Penrose, who recognize his towering intellect and contributions to the field.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, students of mathematical physics, and anyone interested in the legacy of Sir Michael Atiyah and the ongoing discussions surrounding the Riemann Hypothesis.
I believe the world is all the richer for his works last September, if they are viewed as they should be viewed: a conjecture by a giant, possibly who realizes that cognitive decline has begun, instead of a proper proof.jedishrfu said:One wonders if his last talk on the Riemann Hypothesis proof was a Fermat moment.
Replicating the function is difficult, no doubt see e.g. the point @mitchell porter makes:jedishrfu said:Apparently, the proof hinged on the mysterious Todd function which no one knew how he had/if he had constructed it.
But it certainly is not an insurmountable problem using 8.11 and I'm sure it has privately been achieved by others as well; however, having said that, running the resulting function on a computer seems to be problematic to say the very least.mitchell porter said:Here we should face again the fact that no participant in the Internet discussions around Atiyah's claims has understood his two papers in anything like a comprehensive way. People just focus on some little part that they think they understand. For example, it's only now that I really noticed the actual formula for "ж"! ... equation 8.11, a double limit of a sum of "Bernoulli numbers of higher order". And when I check the reddit attempt to reproduce Atiyah's calculation, 8.11 is all but ignored.