What was Sir Michael Atiyah's legacy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter George Jones
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the legacy of Sir Michael Atiyah, particularly focusing on his contributions to mathematics and mathematical physics, as well as the implications of his last talk regarding the Riemann Hypothesis. Participants reflect on his influence, the controversies surrounding his later work, and the potential future of his conjectures.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express admiration for Atiyah's contributions and legacy, noting his impact on mathematical physics.
  • There is speculation about whether Atiyah's last talk on the Riemann Hypothesis proof represents a significant moment akin to Fermat's Last Theorem.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the validity of Atiyah's proof, with some doubting its correctness while acknowledging the courage to attempt difficult problems.
  • Participants mention the mysterious Todd function associated with Atiyah's proof, highlighting the challenges in understanding and replicating it.
  • Some contributions reflect on Atiyah's cognitive decline and its potential impact on his later work, suggesting that his conjectures may require significant time to be fully understood.
  • There are references to the possibility of Atiyah's manuscripts and notes becoming available, which could provide further insights or clarify his claims.
  • Quotes attributed to Atiyah are shared, illustrating his philosophical approach to mathematics and problem-solving.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of Atiyah's proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, with some expressing skepticism while others appreciate the attempt and its implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the future significance of his conjectures.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in understanding Atiyah's work, particularly concerning the Todd function and the mathematical details of his proof, which some participants indicate are not comprehensively grasped by the community.

Mathematics news on Phys.org
I wished he would have avoided last years controverse. His (excellent) books will survive!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
Rest in peace Sir Atiyah!
 
One wonders if his last talk on the Riemann Hypothesis proof was a Fermat moment.

One that will forever be remembered for what could have been.

Has there been any further discussion on it?

I remember there was a piece missing that Sir Michael said would be published.

I found this on Quora but it seems nothing came of it:

https://www.quora.com/Now-that-he-s...ann-Hypothesis-likely-to-stand-up-to-scrutiny

Apparently, the proof hinged on the mysterious Todd function which no one knew how he had/if he had constructed it.

More on his other groundbreaking mathematical work:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Atiyah
 
Last edited:
Atiyah has directly shaped mathematical physics for the rest of time. Just last night I was watching an interview of his (posted by @romsofia here).

Requiescat in pace, dear Sir
jedishrfu said:
One wonders if his last talk on the Riemann Hypothesis proof was a Fermat moment.
I believe the world is all the richer for his works last September, if they are viewed as they should be viewed: a conjecture by a giant, possibly who realizes that cognitive decline has begun, instead of a proper proof.

We do not know how long ago he started nor worked on the matter, before he wasn't able to work as good as he used to do. It was abundantly clear that the man wasn't at peak performance anymore; there is no shame in this, certainly not at his age.

One only needs to recall how other intellectual giants (e.g. among others Edward Witten, Robbert Dijkgraaf (both students of Atiyah who clearly should not need any introduction whatsoever here) and Roger Penrose, (a colleague of Atiyah since their time in college together under Todd (undergrad) and Hodge (graduate)) speak about Michael's towering intellect until this very day.

There is the possibility Atiyah's manuscripts and notes will become available online; depending on their contents we will either learn much more or be able to put the matter to rest.

It would indeed be a tremendous irony if it turns out that in the course of history his conjecture does turn out to carry weight, but like Fermat would need 3 centuries or more for mathematics to advance before it could be properly dissected and understood.
jedishrfu said:
Apparently, the proof hinged on the mysterious Todd function which no one knew how he had/if he had constructed it.
Replicating the function is difficult, no doubt see e.g. the point @mitchell porter makes:
mitchell porter said:
Here we should face again the fact that no participant in the Internet discussions around Atiyah's claims has understood his two papers in anything like a comprehensive way. People just focus on some little part that they think they understand. For example, it's only now that I really noticed the actual formula for "ж"! ... equation 8.11, a double limit of a sum of "Bernoulli numbers of higher order". And when I check the reddit attempt to reproduce Atiyah's calculation, 8.11 is all but ignored.
But it certainly is not an insurmountable problem using 8.11 and I'm sure it has privately been achieved by others as well; however, having said that, running the resulting function on a computer seems to be problematic to say the very least.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mathwonk and jedishrfu
I doubt his proof of RH works but I am very happy he presented it. What joie de vivre! In the last two days I have read of the passing of three greats whom I had the pleasure and privilege to actually meet and exchange (or overhear) a few words with, Atiyah, Eli Stein, and Peter Swinnerton-Dyer. As to the RH stuff by Atiyah, remember one cannot make any progress without the courage to attempt something hard, and be willing to be wrong. His K theory book was one of the less than half my books that made the cut for my big move a few years back, and is still on my shelf for retirement reading. I recall his remark that Fourier series or transforms are one of the major ideas in mathematics, and it is another one I have never mastered.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu and Auto-Didact
I have be moved by one of his quotes for some time now: (paraphrased): "I do not go looking for a mathematical problem to solve, rather I just wade in the mathematical waters and let the tides move me."

That is how the RH will be proven one day I suspect.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
4K