- 7,643
- 1,602
Another great has gone.
https://royalsociety.org/news/2019/...dent-of-the-royal-society-sir-michael-atiyah/
https://royalsociety.org/news/2019/...dent-of-the-royal-society-sir-michael-atiyah/
The discussion revolves around the legacy of Sir Michael Atiyah, particularly focusing on his contributions to mathematics and mathematical physics, as well as the implications of his last talk regarding the Riemann Hypothesis. Participants reflect on his influence, the controversies surrounding his later work, and the potential future of his conjectures.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the validity of Atiyah's proof of the Riemann Hypothesis, with some expressing skepticism while others appreciate the attempt and its implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the future significance of his conjectures.
There are limitations in understanding Atiyah's work, particularly concerning the Todd function and the mathematical details of his proof, which some participants indicate are not comprehensively grasped by the community.
I believe the world is all the richer for his works last September, if they are viewed as they should be viewed: a conjecture by a giant, possibly who realizes that cognitive decline has begun, instead of a proper proof.jedishrfu said:One wonders if his last talk on the Riemann Hypothesis proof was a Fermat moment.
Replicating the function is difficult, no doubt see e.g. the point @mitchell porter makes:jedishrfu said:Apparently, the proof hinged on the mysterious Todd function which no one knew how he had/if he had constructed it.
But it certainly is not an insurmountable problem using 8.11 and I'm sure it has privately been achieved by others as well; however, having said that, running the resulting function on a computer seems to be problematic to say the very least.mitchell porter said:Here we should face again the fact that no participant in the Internet discussions around Atiyah's claims has understood his two papers in anything like a comprehensive way. People just focus on some little part that they think they understand. For example, it's only now that I really noticed the actual formula for "ж"! ... equation 8.11, a double limit of a sum of "Bernoulli numbers of higher order". And when I check the reddit attempt to reproduce Atiyah's calculation, 8.11 is all but ignored.