What was so extraordinary about Landau damping?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheCanadian
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Damping Landau
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of Landau damping, particularly its historical significance and the reasons it was initially met with skepticism. Participants explore the nature of wave-particle interactions in the context of collisionless plasmas and seek to understand what makes Landau damping distinct from other wave phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Landau damping allows for wave damping without collisions, which was surprising to many when first introduced.
  • One participant questions the uniqueness of Landau damping, suggesting that all wave-particle interactions occur without collisions, such as electromagnetic waves affecting stationary electrons.
  • Another participant mentions their background research, including various derivations of Landau damping, and expresses confusion about why this phenomenon was not previously believed possible.
  • A participant references Vlasov's work on the collisionless Boltzmann equation and suggests that Landau's analysis may have been groundbreaking due to the lack of prior studies on wave-particle interactions in collisionless kinetic theory.
  • There is a comparison made between the skepticism surrounding Landau damping and the historical skepticism of Fresnel's wave theory of light, highlighting a pattern of disbelief in unexpected results lacking experimental validation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and skepticism regarding the historical context and implications of Landau damping. There is no consensus on why it was considered extraordinary, and multiple viewpoints remain regarding its uniqueness and the nature of wave-particle interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the mathematical derivations involved in Landau damping and the historical context of the Vlasov equation, but do not resolve the uncertainties surrounding these topics.

TheCanadian
Messages
361
Reaction score
13
I've been told Landau damping was a surprising phenomenon that many people didn't believe possible when first introduced since it permit wave damping in the absence of collisions. I appear to be missing something fairly basic and fundamental to this picture, but aren't all wave-particle interactions without collisions (e.g. electromagnetic wave moving a stationary electron)? What was so revolutionary at the time?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheCanadian said:
I've been told Landau damping was a surprising phenomenon that many people didn't believe possible when first introduced since it permit wave damping in the absence of collisions.
So you have marked your thread with an A tag ... post graduate level
What specific reading/research have you done so far and what didn't you understand about anything
in particular that you read so that people can give you good answers
 
davenn said:
So you have marked your thread with an A tag ... post graduate level
What specific reading/research have you done so far and what didn't you understand about anything
in particular that you read so that people can give you good answers

Ahh well this is a very basic question so my apologies. I've gone through multiple different derivations of this phenomenon (e.g. via Laplace transform or strictly laborious algebra), and it appears in multiple places but I've mainly read through notes for MIT OCW 22.611 (the graduate intro plasma physics). The individual steps in the derivations make sense, but I'm simply wondering why this is a unique phenomenon not previously believed possible before it was derived and then experimentally proven. What's so different about this type of wave damping not seen in other wave-particle interactions?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jasonRF
TheCanadian said:
I've been told Landau damping was a surprising phenomenon that many people didn't believe possible when first introduced since it permit wave damping in the absence of collisions.
I heard that also, but have not researched it to learn if it is true. Let's assume it is true, though.

I've never read up on the history to understand why, but it is my understanding that Vlasov was the first to point out that the collisional terms in the Boltzmann equation should be negligible in a hot plasma. Landau's analysis of that collisionless Boltzmann equation (now called the Vlasov equation) appeared in the literature just one year after Vlasov's work was published (at least I think it was ... could you verify/refute this for us?). So I suspect that the answer to
TheCanadian said:
What's so different about this type of wave damping not seen in other wave-particle interactions?
is that there were no other wave-particle interactions studied in the context of collisionless kinetic theory prior to Landau's work. Collisionless fluid models of course show that waves would not be damped, and since there was not a lot of theoretical predictions based on the Vlasov equation available to compare with theory, it may not have been obvious that the Vlasov equation really was a good mathematical model at all. So it may be no surprise that when unexpected results come out of a relatively difficult mathematical analysis of an unverified model, that the community really wants to see the experiment to believe what is going on.

TheCanadian said:
... I'm simply wondering why this is a unique phenomenon not previously believed possible before it was derived and then experimentally proven.
Not unique in this regard at all. Perhaps a similar (and much more profound) case was when Fresnel first presented his wave theory of light. Poisson performed a mathematical analysis that showed the wave theory predicts a bright spot right in the middle of the shadow of a disk or sphere when illuminated by monochromatic light. This apparently lead some folks (including Poisson!) to dismiss the wave theory of light because this was an unexpected result that had no experimental evidence ... yet. Arago then did the experiment and found the spot.

I would assert that in some sense the fluid theory of plasmas is analogous to the ray theory of light, and the kinetic theory of plasmas is analogous to the wave theory of light.Jason
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
13K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
27K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
11K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K