What was the first living organism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsaun777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Organism
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of what constitutes the first living organism and the criteria that differentiate living entities from inanimate matter. Participants explore definitions of life, the characteristics of early life forms, and the evolutionary relationship between archaea and bacteria.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the distinction between living and non-living entities, seeking clarity on when molecular mixtures transition to life.
  • One participant proposes a set of criteria for defining life, including organization, homeostasis, metabolism, growth, response to stimuli, and reproduction.
  • Another participant suggests examining the shared features of archaea and bacteria to understand their common ancestry and the characteristics of early life forms.
  • A hypothesis is presented regarding the origins of life involving geochemical processes at deep-sea hydrothermal vents, leading to the formation of complex organic compounds and cellular structures.
  • There is mention of the importance of membranes and nucleic acids for Darwinian evolution, though this criterion is contested by some participants.
  • Links to external resources are provided for further reading on abiogenesis and cell history.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the criteria for defining life and the nature of the first life forms. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the ambiguity in definitions of life, the reliance on specific assumptions about early Earth conditions, and the unresolved nature of the evolutionary timeline between archaea and bacteria.

dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
What was the first life form and how would you make the distinction or cutoff from what is inanimate and what is living? When do mixes of molecules stop being particles and start being alive?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It is surely a fuzzy line between non-life and life, but there are some definitions that distinguish them. Here is one set of criteria:

  • Organization: being structurally composed of one or more cells
  • Homeostasis: regulation of the internal environment
  • Metabolism: transformation of energy by converting chemicals and energy into cellular components
  • Growth: a growing organism increases in size in all of its parts, rather than simply accumulating matter.
  • Response to stimuli: a response can take many forms, from the contraction of a unicellular organism to external chemicals, to complex reactions involving all the senses of multicellular organisms. A response is often expressed by motion; for example, the leaves of a plant turning toward the sun (phototropism), and chemotaxis.
  • Reproduction: the ability to produce new individual organisms, either asexually from a single parent organism or sexually from two parent organisms.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt, pinball1970, BillTre and 2 others
An approach to this kind of question that I like is to look at what features archaea and bacteria share in common. Archaea appear very similar to bacteria, but are a distinct and equally ancient group. Their shared features are likely inherited from their original common ancestor, while differences presumably arose later.
Common features of these two groups include:
  • having a membrane (but not its chemical composition)
  • the translation mechanism to make proteins from nucleic acid encoded sequences (ribosomes and tRNAs, however the ribosomes have some differences between the two groups)
  • the electron transport system which uses redox driven movement of electrons to pump H+ ions out of the cell
  • an ATPase which, driven by the different H+ concentration, makes ATP (the major chemical energy currency in cells)
  • RNA and DNA
  • some but not all DNA synthetic enzymes
Another common approach is to consider how life might have arisen on the early earth. The most reasonable scenario (IMHO, however there are several other hypotheses) makes use of natural geochemically driven situations were fluids with very different redox potentials come together generating large differences in redox potential. These can be found in deep sea alkaline hydrothermal vents (white smokers driven by the serpentinization of basalt rather than black smokers driven by the heat of recently cooled magma). The composition of post-Hadean oceans (different from today's oceans) are thought to have resulted in an even larger redox potential between the two fluids than is found now. By using iron, nickel, and sulfur compounds (also more abundant in the oceans at the time) as catalysts, redox reactions reduced CO2 and formed increasingly complex organic compounds, in some not fully understood manner.
Then membranes formed along with the electron transport system, the ATPase, metabolism, and nucleic acids.
Eventually these things were able to escape from the vents when they were able to become independent for their energy needs from their reliance on the unique redox situation they arose in.
It is sometime in along here that archaea and bacteria are thought to have split. Thus, their common ancestor would have been earlier (presumably defined as alive by then).

What would the first life form have been like?
Depends how you want to define it and on unknown details , but this kind of thinking can provide some constraints.
For Darwinian evolution to happen (cited as a criteria for life by some, but argued against by others) would require a nucleic acid encoding system for proteins and cell membranes to provide a keep everything together, house the electron transport system.
Keeping everything (molecular) together (with the membrane) would make biochemistry work better (products of synthesis not diffusing away). It would also be important for Darwinian evolution, in that it also provides a unique entity for selection to operate upon. Such a selected entity would contain a whole constellation of molecular components that could function together. It would also provide a barrier to genetic parasites that would try to take advantage of any successful organism.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dsaun777, Greg Bernhardt, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Thread locked - digression into speculation.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K