What was the first living organism?

  • Thread starter dsaun777
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Organism
In summary, it is likely that the first life form was something that was able to form membranes and use the electron transport system. Mixes of molecules that do not have these features are not considered alive. Life is thought to have arisen on the early earth when geochemical driven situations were able to create large differences in redox potential. Some sort of membrane-containing entity would need to arise for Darwinian evolution to happen.
  • #1
dsaun777
293
39
What was the first life form and how would you make the distinction or cutoff from what is inanimate and what is living? When do mixes of molecules stop being particles and start being alive?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
It is surely a fuzzy line between non-life and life, but there are some definitions that distinguish them. Here is one set of criteria:

  • Organization: being structurally composed of one or more cells
  • Homeostasis: regulation of the internal environment
  • Metabolism: transformation of energy by converting chemicals and energy into cellular components
  • Growth: a growing organism increases in size in all of its parts, rather than simply accumulating matter.
  • Response to stimuli: a response can take many forms, from the contraction of a unicellular organism to external chemicals, to complex reactions involving all the senses of multicellular organisms. A response is often expressed by motion; for example, the leaves of a plant turning toward the sun (phototropism), and chemotaxis.
  • Reproduction: the ability to produce new individual organisms, either asexually from a single parent organism or sexually from two parent organisms.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt, pinball1970, BillTre and 2 others
  • #3
An approach to this kind of question that I like is to look at what features archaea and bacteria share in common. Archaea appear very similar to bacteria, but are a distinct and equally ancient group. Their shared features are likely inherited from their original common ancestor, while differences presumably arose later.
Common features of these two groups include:
  • having a membrane (but not its chemical composition)
  • the translation mechanism to make proteins from nucleic acid encoded sequences (ribosomes and tRNAs, however the ribosomes have some differences between the two groups)
  • the electron transport system which uses redox driven movement of electrons to pump H+ ions out of the cell
  • an ATPase which, driven by the different H+ concentration, makes ATP (the major chemical energy currency in cells)
  • RNA and DNA
  • some but not all DNA synthetic enzymes
Another common approach is to consider how life might have arisen on the early earth. The most reasonable scenario (IMHO, however there are several other hypotheses) makes use of natural geochemically driven situations were fluids with very different redox potentials come together generating large differences in redox potential. These can be found in deep sea alkaline hydrothermal vents (white smokers driven by the serpentinization of basalt rather than black smokers driven by the heat of recently cooled magma). The composition of post-Hadean oceans (different from today's oceans) are thought to have resulted in an even larger redox potential between the two fluids than is found now. By using iron, nickel, and sulfur compounds (also more abundant in the oceans at the time) as catalysts, redox reactions reduced CO2 and formed increasingly complex organic compounds, in some not fully understood manner.
Then membranes formed along with the electron transport system, the ATPase, metabolism, and nucleic acids.
Eventually these things were able to escape from the vents when they were able to become independent for their energy needs from their reliance on the unique redox situation they arose in.
It is sometime in along here that archaea and bacteria are thought to have split. Thus, their common ancestor would have been earlier (presumably defined as alive by then).

What would the first life form have been like?
Depends how you want to define it and on unknown details , but this kind of thinking can provide some constraints.
For Darwinian evolution to happen (cited as a criteria for life by some, but argued against by others) would require a nucleic acid encoding system for proteins and cell membranes to provide a keep everything together, house the electron transport system.
Keeping everything (molecular) together (with the membrane) would make biochemistry work better (products of synthesis not diffusing away). It would also be important for Darwinian evolution, in that it also provides a unique entity for selection to operate upon. Such a selected entity would contain a whole constellation of molecular components that could function together. It would also provide a barrier to genetic parasites that would try to take advantage of any successful organism.
 
  • Like
Likes dsaun777, Greg Bernhardt, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #4
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #5
Thread locked - digression into speculation.
 

1. What is the definition of a living organism?

A living organism is any individual entity that exhibits the characteristics of life, including the ability to grow, reproduce, maintain homeostasis, respond to stimuli, and adapt to its environment.

2. How do scientists determine what the first living organism was?

Scientists use a variety of methods, including fossil records, genetic analysis, and biochemical evidence, to trace the origins of life on Earth and determine the first living organism.

3. Was the first living organism a single-celled or multi-celled organism?

The first living organism is believed to have been a single-celled organism, as the evolution of multi-celled organisms came much later in Earth's history.

4. What conditions were necessary for the first living organism to emerge?

The first living organism likely emerged in a primordial soup of organic molecules, with a suitable energy source and the right combination of elements and environmental conditions to support life.

5. Is it possible that the first living organism was not from Earth?

While it is a topic of debate, most scientists believe that the first living organism originated on Earth due to the specific conditions and chemical makeup of our planet. However, the possibility of extraterrestrial life is still being explored through ongoing research and space exploration.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
42
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top