What was the mistake in solving for the speeds of two marbles after a collision?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving for the speeds of two marbles after an elastic collision. The initial calculations yielded an incorrect speed of 2.22 m/s for one marble, prompting confusion about which question it addressed. Participants emphasized the importance of showing work and suggested simplifying equations when one mass is at rest. A rounding error was noted as a potential issue, and ultimately, the correct answer was found to be due to an algebra mistake. Clear communication and detailed calculations are essential for solving such problems accurately.
anotherphysicsgeek
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A 49.0 g marble moving at 1.90 m/s strikes a 28.0 g marble at rest. Note that the collision is elastic and that it is a "head-on" collision so all motion is along a line.

What is the speed of 49.0 g marble immediately after the collision?
What is the speed of 28.0 g marble immediately after the collision?
Relevant Equations
1. m1v1i+m2v2i=m1v1f+m2v2f
2. 1/2m1v1i^2+1/2m2v2i^2=1/2m1v1f^2+1/2m2v2f^2
Solved equation 1 for v1f and then substituted into equation 2 and solved for v2f. Got 2.22 as the answer, but it said the answer is incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
anotherphysicsgeek said:
Homework Statement: A 49.0 g marble moving at 1.90 m/s strikes a 28.0 g marble at rest. Note that the collision is elastic and that it is a "head-on" collision so all motion is along a line.

What is the speed of 49.0 g marble immediately after the collision?
What is the speed of 28.0 g marble immediately after the collision?
Relevant Equations: 1. m1v1i+m2v2i=m1v1f+m2v2f
2. 1/2m1v1i^2+1/2m2v2i^2=1/2m1v1f^2+1/2m2v2f^2

Got 4.4333 as the answer
This is the answer to what? There are two questions.
 
Last edited:
Hill said:
This is the answer to what? There are two questions.
Sorry it was the answer to the second question. Also going back and re-plugging in the numbers I got 2.22, but it's still wrong.
 
anotherphysicsgeek said:
Sorry it was the answer to the second question. Also going back and re-plugging in the numbers I got 2.22, but it's still wrong.
You need to show your work. Also, take a look at the Latex guide for maths equations, under the help pages.

In a question like this, where one mass is initially at rest, I would automatically simplify the relevant Equations. If you reply to this post, you'll see the Latex I used. I prefer ##u, v## to ##v_i, v_f##. E.g.
$$m_1u_1 = m_1v_1+m_2v_2$$$$\frac 1 2 m_1u_1^2 = \frac 1 2 m_1v_1^2 +\frac 1 2 m_2v_2^2$$
 
anotherphysicsgeek said:
Sorry it was the answer to the second question. Also going back and re-plugging in the numbers I got 2.22, but it's still wrong.
That's not far off. Maybe a rounding error. Keep at least three sig figs until the end.
But it is silly having to guess. As @PeroK says, post your working.
 
Thank you guys, and I'll fix that in the future. I ended up finding the correct answer and it was an algebra mistake.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top