The discussion revolves around the properties of the fifth spatial dimension in relation to a tesseract, exploring concepts of higher dimensions, tunneling properties of particles, and the implications of time in the fourth dimension. Participants engage with theoretical frameworks, including Kaluza-Klein theory and its relationship to gravity and electromagnetism.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the properties of the fifth dimension or its implications for tunneling and other physical phenomena. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain throughout the discussion.
Some claims depend on specific interpretations of higher-dimensional theories, and the discussion reflects a variety of assumptions about the nature of dimensions and their mathematical representations. The relationship between classical theories and quantum mechanics remains unresolved.
I don't know!Originally posted by elas
Right now you have 3 dimension note that they are all part of the electromagnetic spectrum; are you prepared to accept that each force has its own spectrum?
The only reason we see 3-d is that we have two eyes, but if we had one wew would only see 2-d. Better yet, if we had three eyes we would probably see 4-d.I'm sorry. I can see the mathematics behind it, but I just can't buy that anything in this universe could physically be only one dimension, let alone two dimensions. I mean we live in a world that depends on 3-D...
yes, that is where we get string theory.But even if we had one eye, we could deduce through observation that a "2-d" object that we perceive to be as such, has length, width, and depth.