What would you call this, in technical language?

  • Thread starter Thread starter KingNothing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Language
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a technical description for a device resembling a double-jointed robotic arm. Participants suggest terms like "2DOF manipulator" and "double pendulum configuration" to better capture its mechanics. There is a consensus that the term "robotic" may be misleading due to the absence of actuators, with some favoring simpler descriptions like "joints & sticks." One proposed term is "a 2D representation of a multi-axis linear assembly," though it lacks clarity without visual context. Ultimately, the term "double-jointed arm" is favored for its straightforwardness.
KingNothing
Messages
880
Reaction score
4
I'm an EE with a fried brain right now, how would you describe the device in the attached picture in technical language?

So far I've called it a "double-jointed robotic arm with one joint affixed to a mounting surface". That sounds really bad and not descriptive.
 

Attachments

  • fixed rod what.png
    fixed rod what.png
    6.3 KB · Views: 511
Engineering news on Phys.org
2DOF manipulator. This is like a double pendulum configuration: two rotational joints connected in series. Maybe that will give some search terms to narrow down the conventional nomenclature.
 
I wouldn't involve the term "robotic" at all, since there are no actuator mechanisms. It's just a bunch of joints held together with sticks.
The best that I can currently think of is "a 2D representation of a multi-axis linear assembly". That, of course, makes no sense whatsoever unless accompanied by the illustration. (Personally, I'd go with the "joints & sticks" explanation... :-p)
 
I'd go with double-jointed arm.
 
What mathematics software should engineering students use? Is it correct that much of the engineering industry relies on MATLAB, making it the tool many graduates will encounter in professional settings? How does SageMath compare? It is a free package that supports both numerical and symbolic computation and can be installed on various platforms. Could it become more widely used because it is freely available? I am an academic who has taught engineering mathematics, and taught the...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
567
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K