What's the truth behind CCC's concentric circles prediction for the CMB?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter twistor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circles Cmb Penrose
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the paper titled "Concentric Circles in the CMB" by Roger Penrose, which presents a prediction related to the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and the Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC) model. Participants debate the significance of the findings, questioning whether they enhance the plausibility of Penrose's model. The consensus indicates that initial attempts to identify concentric circles were flawed, leading to skepticism about subsequent analyses, despite improvements in methodology.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) theory
  • Familiarity with Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (CCC)
  • Knowledge of statistical analysis in cosmology
  • Ability to interpret scientific papers and research findings
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Penrose's CCC model on cosmological theories
  • Study the methodologies used in analyzing CMB data
  • Examine critiques and validations of Penrose's concentric circles prediction
  • Explore advancements in cosmological statistical analysis techniques
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers interested in the implications of the Cosmic Microwave Background and the Conformal Cyclic Cosmology model.

twistor
Messages
74
Reaction score
8
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1510.06537v1.pdf

I found this semirecent paper about CCC's concentric circles prediction for the CMB.

Is this just another piece of the debate, or is its significance enough to increase the plausibility of Penrose's model?

Thank you in advance for your answers, and please forgive my poor english :D
 
Space news on Phys.org
I was at a conference when this paper was presented. Little flaws were found if I recall . My take is that the first attempt done by Penrose to find the circles was badly done and so no one wanted to listen the next time round even though the analysis was better performed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K