What's the Process for Publishing Scientific Papers?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The process of publishing scientific papers involves several key steps, primarily through established journals rather than preprint servers like arXiv.org or viXra.org. Papers uploaded to arXiv are not considered officially published; they are typically in the peer-review process for journal submission. Authors must adhere to specific journal guidelines, undergo peer review, and may incur publication costs, often covered by universities or grants. Engaging with experienced researchers or professors is crucial for navigating this complex landscape and enhancing the quality of submissions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the peer review process in academic publishing
  • Familiarity with journal submission guidelines and formatting
  • Knowledge of arXiv.org and its role in the scientific community
  • Awareness of publication costs and funding sources for scientific research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specific submission guidelines for your target journal
  • Learn about the peer review process and how to prepare for it
  • Explore funding options for publication costs, including grants and institutional support
  • Connect with local university faculty or graduate students for mentorship on publishing
USEFUL FOR

Independent researchers, aspiring authors in the sciences, and anyone seeking to understand the academic publishing process and improve their chances of successful publication.

  • #61
Also journals are *terrible* for handling new and original ideas. If you have a new and original idea, then you want to share it with your friends over beer at a conference.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #62
weburbia said:
you underestimate how difficult that can be for someone with no academic affiliation. Publishing in high impact factor journals seems to be very difficult and possibly expensive for outsiders.
I have no academic affiliation and publish a half-dozen papers per year or so. The only difficulty is that people w/o academic affiliations rarely have anything of high enough quality to pass peer review. Those that do have high quality research and writing have no more difficulty getting published than their academic counterparts.

If an academic wrote a great paper and a non academic wrote a piece of junk and then they swapped papers and each submitted the other's paper then generally the academic's affiliation would not make the junk pass peer review and the non academic's lack of affiliation would not prevent the great paper from passing peer review.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K