What's Your Favorite Scientific Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BadgerBadger92
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around participants sharing their favorite scientific theories across various fields, including physics, biology, and social sciences. The scope includes theoretical concepts, conjectures, and models, with a focus on personal preferences rather than formal evaluations of these theories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express a preference for special relativity and general relativity, highlighting their significance in physics.
  • Others mention theories such as simulation theory, which is viewed as more speculative or fantastical.
  • Several participants cite various theories from biology, including cell theory, evolution by natural selection, and endosymbiosis, emphasizing their foundational role in modern biology.
  • Murphy's Law is noted by multiple participants, with anecdotal evidence presented to support its validity.
  • The rishon model is discussed in detail by one participant, who outlines its implications for particle physics and the composition of matter.
  • Some participants refer to Dunning-Kruger as a theory, indicating its relevance in discussions about knowledge and competence.
  • Conjectures about the universe being finite and theories related to abiogenesis and symbiogenesis are also mentioned, showcasing a range of interests.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of personal favorites without reaching a consensus. Multiple competing views and theories are presented, and the discussion remains open-ended with no definitive conclusions drawn.

Contextual Notes

Some theories mentioned are speculative or lack empirical evidence, such as the idea of the Moon being an alien spaceship or the rishon model's claims about particle interactions. The discussion reflects a mix of established scientific theories and more unconventional ideas.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals exploring diverse scientific theories, students seeking inspiration for research topics, or those curious about the intersection of different scientific disciplines.

BadgerBadger92
Messages
168
Reaction score
89
I was just wondering what all of your guys favorite theory! For me it is a tie between special relativity and general relativity. I mainly want to know so I can look up any theories posted and learn about them.

So what’s your favorite theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I was quite impressed by Guns, Germs, and Steel by Jared Diamond.
Simulation theory also sounds like fun, but it is more like fantasy then anything we'll ever really be able to use.
 
That Stan Lee is really Uatu, the Watcher.

Seriously, original Heisenberg Matrix Mechanics.

-Dan
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Klystron, PeroK and Hornbein
Dunning & Kruger
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd, gmax137, DaveE and 4 others
I like the theory that the Moon is an alien spaceship.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: mcastillo356 and topsquark
Quantum Field Theory
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Grelbr42
I find that there are many conjectures sometimes referred to by "Theory". My favorite is the conjecture/Theory that the universe is finite.
 
My fave theory is clearly QED. It's massively successful with comparisons to experiment to an amazing number of digits. The magnetic moment of the electron is now getting to the point where we will need to include weak interactions to progress the calculation.

For things *adjacent* to theories, not really theory as such, but important results, I have two that I am exceedingly fond of.

There is Noether's theorem. It connects symmetry to conserved quantities.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem

And there is Bell's inequality. This is a result that shows a method that can experimentally distinguish between causal-deterministic theories and quantum mechanics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell's_theorem
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
  • #10
I can't believe I missed this thread when it first came out :woot:.
 
  • Wow
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #11
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pythagorean
  • #12
Dunning-Kruger
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tommy White and BillTre
  • #13
Experimental evidence over many years tells me that my favorite is Murphy's Law.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander, gleem, DaveE and 1 other person
  • #14
Vanadium 50 said:
Dunning & Kruger
DaveE said:
Dunning-Kruger
Hmmm....
 
  • #15
phinds said:
Murphy's Law.
When I was a student I went to a colloquium by a guy who floew balloons. He plotted the fraction of time they landed instrument side down vs. the cost of the payload - a straight line. Experimental proof of Murphy's Law!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd
  • #16
Do we really need more proof?
 
  • #17
My favorite theory is the Aquatic Theory, that mankind originated in a place where they did a lot of swimming.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
  • #18
My favorite is the rishon model. Only two Weyl spinor fields (and 17 (8+8+1) associated massless gauge fields, based on a SU(3)xSU(3)xU(1) symmetry) are needed to describe the world of particles (without gravity). If one of them, call it C (with anti c) is electrically charged (1/3), and the other has zero electric charge (the rest being equal), call it Y (with anti u) then the particles of the standard model are:

Elektron: ccc
Up-quark: CCU
Down-quark: cuu
E. neutrino: UUU

Families are excitations of these bound states.

It's interesting to see what happens if we consider the electron, proton, neutron, and neutrino (which are universally present in a 1:1:1:1 ratio):

Electron: ccc
Proton: CCU CCU cuu
Neutron: CCU cuu cuu
Neutrino: UUU

What do we see? There are 6 C's and c's, and 6 U's and U's. Which means equal amounts of matter and antimatter! Which means that a version Wheeler's one-electron universe is applicable (and in this model a positron is indeed present in the proton as Wheeler hypothesized). The electron being a U or a C. Proton decay is "easily" explained (heuristically). In fact, ALL particle interactions could be.explained in this way .

Of course, there is no evidence that quarks or leptons are composite. But there is a lot of space left between the Planck scale and 10^-21m. Just smash two electrons head-on and listen if you hear a rattle within them. Or maybe the muon-g2 experiment is an expression of this theory. Or it is a fata morgana. Nature will tell us. I wonder how strong theory had to modified, if that could be done....
 
  • #20
I also have several:

abiogenesis (how life started from chemistry and physics)
symbiogenesis (eukaryotes are the result of cells "eating" other cells then making them into organelles)
generalized information theory (still under construction)
Proto-Indo-European reconstruction (Sanskrit, Persian, Gaelic, Russian, English, Norwegian and many more all descended from the same ancestor language and we can assess this through technique analogous to genealogy)
topological approach to quantum gravity (entangled particles are doughnut holes or something, I don't know)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 190 ·
7
Replies
190
Views
16K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K