Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Coughlan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theory
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory posits that electromagnetic waves, such as gamma rays, can traverse time both forward and backward. This theory raises questions about the interaction of these waves with charged and uncharged particles in proximity. Specifically, the discussion explores whether time-reversed waves exist between charged particles or if they are influenced by uncharged particles. While the mathematical complexities of this theory may be challenging, it remains a topic of debate rather than outright dismissal in the scientific community.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts
  • Basic knowledge of particle physics
  • Awareness of time symmetry in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory on modern physics
  • Study the mathematical framework of time-reversal symmetry in quantum mechanics
  • Explore experimental evidence related to electromagnetic wave interactions with charged particles
  • Investigate alternative theories regarding the nature of time and causality in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in advanced concepts of time and electromagnetic interactions will benefit from this discussion.

Coughlan
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
In the Wheeler-Feynman absorber theory I understand that the gammas rays terverse time for and aft, but is that between their destinations, or the next closest particle. What I mean is what if you had a sea of uncharged particles, and two charged particles 'jiggling' with a set distance between them, would the waves going back in time exsist between the charged or uncharged particles?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why not? i mean I'm sure that math is way over my head but has it been disproved? or just not accepted or what? :bugeye:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 134 ·
5
Replies
134
Views
11K
  • · Replies 157 ·
6
Replies
157
Views
16K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K