When can we use Vpp in calculations involving Ohm's law?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the use of voltage types in Ohm's Law calculations, specifically addressing the confusion between VRMS and Vpp in AC circuits. The professor instructed that VRMS should be used for power equations (P=VI), while the oscilloscope displayed a peak-to-peak voltage (1Vpp) during lab experiments. It was established that both VRMS and Vp can be used in calculations, provided that the corresponding current type (Irms or Ip) is matched. The discussion emphasizes the convenience of using RMS values in practical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of AC voltage concepts, specifically VRMS and Vpp.
  • Familiarity with Ohm's Law (V=IR) and power equations (P=VI).
  • Basic knowledge of oscilloscopes and their voltage measurements.
  • Concept of sine wave frequency and its impact on voltage readings.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between VRMS and Vpp in AC circuits.
  • Learn how to calculate power using both RMS and peak values in AC systems.
  • Explore the implications of using different voltage types in circuit analysis.
  • Investigate the role of frequency (e.g., 10kHz) in AC voltage measurements.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, physics learners, and anyone involved in circuit design or analysis who seeks to understand the application of Ohm's Law in AC circuits.

Physixs
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


So today in lecture, my professor talked about VRMS. I understand VRMS and its relationship to DC power dissipation, however, in lab today I became very confused.

In lecture, we were told to use the VRMS value when applying Ohms laws/power equations (P=VI). Then, later, in lab we were observing an AC voltage (1Vpp) across to resistors (wired on a breadboard).

The oscilloscope read 1Vpp drop across both resistors - which I was a little confused with... more importantly, I was confused because when I was using OHM's law (V=IR) to calculate the "calculated values" to compare them to the measured values, I used VRMS... since I thought that was what we could ONLY use... the Oscilloscope kept displaying Vpp... so I became very lose because even the text said that you had to use VRMS when using Ohm's laws - which would mean the oscilloscope was displaying the wrong values? or incorrectly using Vpp instead of VRMS?

Can someone help me to understand when we HAVE to use VRMS and when VP or VPP is even ok in a calculation?

Other lab information: We output the 1Vpp Voltage from a signal generated (sine wave) with a Frequency of 10kHz

Thank you so much

Homework Equations


P = VRMS I

The Attempt at a Solution


I got the solution... I just do not understand, from my text and lecture, why Vpp is allowed in Ohm's law. It made sense to me that we had to use RMS values
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Physixs! Welcome to PF! :smile:
Physixs said:
In lecture, we were told to use the VRMS value when applying Ohms laws/power equations (P=VI). Then, later, in lab we were observing an AC voltage (1Vpp) across to resistors (wired on a breadboard).

… when I was using OHM's law (V=IR) to calculate the "calculated values" to compare them to the measured values, I used VRMS... since I thought that was what we could ONLY use... the Oscilloscope kept displaying Vpp... so I became very lose because even the text said that you had to use VRMS when using Ohm's laws - which would mean the oscilloscope was displaying the wrong values? or incorrectly using Vpp instead of VRMS?

For P = VI we can use Vrms and Irms, or we can use Vp and Ip with an extra factor of 1/2.

(for the detailed equation, see eg the pf library on impedance)

Obviously, rms is more convenient! :wink:

For V = IR, I don't see that it makes any difference, so long as you use the same type (rms or p or pp) for both V and I. :wink:
 
Thanks!

That's not what my text said (it said I could ONLY use Vrms when using OHM's laws since the laws were based in DC...) so I was very confused. What you are saying makes a lot more sense!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K