What is the Mistake in Calculating Power Dissipation in a Resistor?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating power dissipation in a resistor, specifically focusing on the conditions under which power is maximized. The problem involves analyzing the total resistance in a circuit and its relationship to current and power dissipation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between total resistance and power dissipation, questioning the conditions for maximum power. There is a focus on the mathematical approach to finding minimum resistance and the implications of the derivative being zero.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the mathematical reasoning behind finding maximum and minimum values. Some participants highlight the importance of considering the boundaries of the allowed range for resistance, while others question the validity of certain methods used in the analysis.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing examination of the restrictions on resistance values, particularly the requirement that resistance cannot be negative. This constraint influences the interpretation of the results derived from the mathematical analysis.

Jahnavi
Messages
848
Reaction score
102

Homework Statement


resistor.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Power dissipated in the 2 Ohms resistor will be maximum when current is maximum .This will occur when total resistance is minimum .

If I think logically then I do get the right answer . But on trying to arrive at the result mathematically I think I am making some silly mistake .

Total resistance is Z = (10R+16)/(8+R)

For Z to be minimum , dz/dR = 0

Calculations give me a weird result 64 = 0

What is my mistake ?
 

Attachments

  • resistor.png
    resistor.png
    24.8 KB · Views: 1,296
Physics news on Phys.org
Jahnavi said:
Power dissipated in the 2 Ohms resistor will be maximum when current is maximum .This will occur when total resistance is minimum.
Correct.
Jahnavi said:
Total resistance is Z = (10R+16)/(8+R)
Correct.
Jahnavi said:
For Z to be minimum , dz/dR = 0
But there is another restriction on R: R>=0
Jahnavi said:
Calculations give me a weird result 64 = 0
That's because the minimum (and maximum) Z occurs when R=-8 and the denominator goes to zero.
But the problem does not allow for a negative R.
 
Your maximum is not a point where the derivative is zero. It is a point at the edge of the allowed range for R (R cannot be negative).

Here is a plot of the current
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
.Scott said:
That's because the minimum (and maximum) Z occurs when R=-8 and the denominator goes to zero.

How did you find that ?
 
Jahnavi said:
How did you find that ?
You have R+8 in the denominator. Solve for R+8=0.
 
mfb said:
Your maximum is not a point where the derivative is zero.

Are you implying that maximum or minimum can occur either at points where derivative is zero OR at end points of allowed domain ?
 
.Scott said:
You have R+8 in the denominator. Solve for R+8=0.

Sorry . But that's not how we find maximum/minimum value of an expression .
 
Jahnavi said:
Sorry . But that's not how we find maximum/minimum value of an expression .
Well. It's how I found it.
The method you used will work for expressions that do not go to infinity - and which have derivatives.
The restrictions are actually more than that - but I think you want to keep the math at the secondary school level.
 
Jahnavi said:
Are you implying that maximum or minimum can occur either at points where derivative is zero OR at end points of allowed domain ?
Yes. You have an example here.

Another example is the maximum of f(x)=x2 in the range of 0 to 2. Clearly the maximum is at x=2 where the derivative is not zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
  • #10
Jahnavi said:
Are you implying that maximum or minimum can occur either at points where derivative is zero OR at end points of allowed domain ?

Yes. Look at the simple example of f(x) = x. The minimum of f(x) on 0 ≤ x ≤ 1 is at x = 0, and the maximum on that interval is at x=1. The derivative = 1 at both of those optimal points.

The theorem you are trying to (mis-)use is that if a differentiable function f(x) has a maximum (or a minimum) at some x in the OPEN interval a < x < b, then the derivative vanishes at x. On a CLOSED interval a ≤ x ≤ b, the derivative = 0 an an interior optimum, but not necessarily at an end-point optimum.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Jahnavi
  • #11
mfb said:
Yes. You have an example here.

Another example is the maximum of f(x)=x2 in the range of 0 to 2. Clearly the maximum is at x=2 where the derivative is not zero.

Thanks !
 

Similar threads

Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K