When current flows through 2 parallel wires (same amount of current)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of protons and electrons in two parallel wires carrying the same current, exploring concepts of attraction, relativistic effects, and symmetry in electric and magnetic forces. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications related to electromagnetism and relativity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that protons in one wire would observe electrons in both wires contracting due to length contraction, raising questions about the nature of attraction between them.
  • Another participant expresses confusion about the meaning of attraction, questioning whether it refers to the force between electrons and protons, and notes that the velocities of free electrons are not relativistic.
  • A different participant introduces the classic argument from relativity regarding parallel wires, emphasizing the need to consider different frames of reference and the forces acting on protons from both wires.
  • A younger participant requests clarification on the symmetry mentioned, indicating a lack of understanding of the concept.
  • Another participant explains that in a single wire with stationary protons, symmetry implies that the net force on a proton is zero due to equal contributions from surrounding protons.
  • A subsequent reply elaborates on the concept of cylindrical symmetry, explaining that forces cannot point radially due to the uniformity of the wire, and that the symmetry allows for simplifications in calculations regarding forces on charged particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the concepts of attraction and symmetry, with some seeking clarification while others present technical arguments. No consensus is reached on the interpretation of forces in the context of parallel wires.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the behavior of charged particles and the implications of symmetry, which may not be universally accepted or fully resolved. The complexity of the interactions in the system is acknowledged but remains open to interpretation.

jeevesh
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
when current flows through 2 parallel wires (same amount of current); the protons in the first wire would see the electrons drifting in a direction and also in the other wire (in the same direction). They would appear to be contracted in the direction which they flow due to length contraction. electrons in both wire would appear to be contacted to the proton so how could feel a attraction and the same question follows for electrons
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what attraction means. Is it the force between electron and proton? In wires, only free electrons in conduction band can flows and their velocity is far less than relativistic regime as far as I know. But the only information propagation is close to the speed of light.
 
You don't say so explicitly, but it sounds like you're trying to understand the classic argument from relativity, based on two parallel wires, that if electric forces exist, so must magnetic forces. There are some ingredients from that argument that you're missing. (1) You have to consider two different frames of reference. (2) The forces on a proton are those due to both the electrons and the protons in the other wire. (Any forces from the proton's own wire vanish by symmetry.) I have a presentation of the argument in this book: http://www.lightandmatter.com/lm/ (section 23.2).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jeevesh
I am only 15 years old and do not know the type of symmetry you are talking about would you please explain a little about this symmetry in easy terms
 
jeevesh said:
I am only 15 years old and do not know the type of symmetry you are talking about would you please explain a little about this symmetry in easy terms

For simplicity, let's say only one wire exists, it only contains protons, and the protons are not moving. In other words, we just have a bunch of protons like beads on a straight string, uniformly spaced. Let's say that the wire is on the z axis. Then there is no direction that the force on a proton could point. It can't have an x component, because there is no reason for, e.g., the positive x direction to be considered different from the negative x direction. The same applies to y and z. Therefore the force on the proton is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jeevesh and jbriggs444
So what is the symmetry here?
 
If there's just one wire, then there's cylindrical symmetry.

That tells you immediately that any force on a proton or electron due to the wire it's in could not point in a radial direction. If it pointed in one direction, which one? You could rotate the wire around its axis and nothing would change, but the force would have to rotate to be consistent with where it was before. That makes no sense - so any force must be in the line of the wire.

But in the line of the wire, the thing that matters most is the charged particles nearby - and there are as many of them infront of any given proton or electron as there are behind. That means that you can make the same argument as above. Flip the wire end-for-end and nothing changes, but any force would have to flip too to be consistent.

This second step is obviously an approximation, since the wire is not of infinite length and a proton or electron will typically be nearer one end than the other. But it's not a bad approximation as long as you think of the wire as "long".

Recognising what symmetries there are in a situation is a very useful trick for short-circuiting complex calculations. In this case, it means that when you are thinking about a proton or electron in one of the wires, you cn ignore the other protons and electrons in that same wire, and only worry about fields from the other wire.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jeevesh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 161 ·
6
Replies
161
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
695
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K