When did the consensus on the maximum recession speed in cosmology change?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter epovo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Hubble Schutz
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the historical understanding of maximum recession speeds in cosmology, particularly the perception that recession speeds could not exceed the speed of light, as noted in Schutz's work. Participants explore the evolution of this consensus and whether it was a topic of debate within the scientific community.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants reference Schutz's assertion that recession speeds cannot exceed the speed of light, suggesting a consensus in 1985 that this was an obvious limitation.
  • Others argue that Schutz's critique of the Hubble Law reflects a deeper understanding of relativistic effects, indicating that he may not have been as emphatic about the impossibility of superluminal recession speeds.
  • A participant notes that Schutz's book is aimed at readers who may not grasp the implications of superluminal speeds, implying a lack of widespread understanding at the time.
  • Some mention a paper by Davis and Lineweaver that discusses misconceptions in cosmology, including the idea that recession speeds cannot exceed the speed of light, suggesting that this misconception persisted beyond 1985.
  • There is a reference to a lack of sources confirming or contradicting the assumption about the common understanding of recession speeds in the scientific community during that period.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether there was a consensus in 1985 regarding the maximum recession speed. Some believe it was widely accepted that speeds could not exceed the speed of light, while others challenge this notion and reference ongoing misconceptions that persisted in later years.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential limitations in understanding Schutz's statements due to the evolving nature of cosmological theories and the historical context of scientific discussions at the time.

epovo
Messages
114
Reaction score
21
TL;DR
In the first edition of Schutz (1985), the author states that the Hubble flow can't make galaxies recede faster than the speed of light.
In the last chapter of Schutz devoted to Cosmology, Schutz writes
Moreover, ## v = Hd ## cannot be exact since, for ##d\gt 1.2 ~10^{26}~\rm{m}= 4000~ \rm{Mpc}##, the velocity exceeds the velocity of light!
So it seems that in 1985 it was assumed as obvious that the recession speed could not exceed ##c##.
The consensus seems to have swiftly changed. When did that happen? Was it debated at all?
 
Space news on Phys.org
I was still at primary school in 1985 so I can't speak to common beliefs, but I think Schutz isn't intending to be quite so emphatic as he sounds. I think he's criticising his cheap'n'cheerful derivation of the Hubble Law as being based on kinda-sorta Newtonian thinking. He expands a bit on it in a later paragraph. In the 2nd edition it's just before the section titled "The universe is accelerating!", but I suspect it might be the end of section 2.2 in your edition. It says "...in the attempt to translate the nonrelativistic formula ##v=Hd## into relativistic language, we were forced to re-think the meaning of all the terms in the equations and go back to the quantities we can directly measure."
 
That paragraph is indeed in the 1st edition at section 2.3 (Cosmological observations). But, given that his book is titled 'A First Course in General Relativity', he could not possibly assume that the reader would understand that recession speeds >c are possible, especially after the quote I gave before. This was written at the time when we thought that the universe expansion must be slowing down, and the big question was why we were so close to the critical density. The quote suggests to me that the common understanding of the time was that recession speeds >c were impossible. But I have not been able to find any source that confirms or contradict my assumption and no trace of any debate in the scientific community about the topic.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Jaime Rudas and Ibix
phyzguy said:
In the excellent paper by Davis and Lineweaver, they list all of the people that have gotten this wrong, including some big names.
This includes the very quote we're discussing - see Appendix B item 6.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Jaime Rudas
epovo said:
So it seems that in 1985 it was assumed as obvious that the recession speed could not exceed ##c##.
I don't think the reason is that in 1985 it was assumed as obvious that the velocity of the recession could not exceed c, because the quote is the same in the second edition (2009).

In fact, Schutz's quote is one of the common misconceptions in cosmology that Davis and Linewaver mention in their (highly recommended) article Expanding Confusion: common misconceptions of cosmological horizons and the superluminal expansion of the universe (2003). See chapter 3.1 and Appendix B [6]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix and epovo
Thank you @Jaime Rudas . I'll be sure to read that article!
 
I never understood what's the hype about Schutz's book...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K