When does a Lipschitz condition fail for a DE?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marellasunny
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Condition Lipschitz
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the failure of the Lipschitz condition in non-autonomous differential equations, particularly in the presence of periodic forcing functions. An example provided is the non-autonomous differential system described by the equation $$\frac{\mathrm{dx}}{\mathrm{d}t} = x^3 + a \sin(\omega t)$$. The participants clarify that while the Lipschitz condition is essential for ensuring uniqueness of solutions, non-autonomous systems can still exhibit unique solutions under specific conditions, as outlined by the Fundamental Existence and Uniqueness Theorem. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between autonomous and non-autonomous systems regarding the existence of periodic orbits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lipschitz continuity in functions
  • Familiarity with non-autonomous differential equations
  • Knowledge of the Fundamental Existence and Uniqueness Theorem
  • Basic concepts of dynamical systems and periodic orbits
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Fundamental Existence and Uniqueness Theorem in non-autonomous systems
  • Explore examples of periodic forcing functions in differential equations
  • Investigate the role of Lipschitz continuity in ensuring solution uniqueness
  • Analyze phase portraits of non-autonomous systems to identify unique solution behaviors
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with differential equations, particularly those interested in the behavior of non-autonomous systems and the implications of Lipschitz continuity on solution uniqueness.

marellasunny
Messages
245
Reaction score
3
could you give an example where the Lipschitz condition fails,like when there is a periodic forcing function?
I'm thinking the Lipschitz condition would fail for a non-autonomous differential system because period-2 orbits exist for 2D non-autonomous continuous dynamical systems,which means the uniqueness condition that the Lipschitz criterion so vehemently describes in DE does not hold for non-auto systems.

How does one explain this mathematically? Intuitively, I could say uniqueness of solution curve exists because of phase change due to the periodic forcing function. But,which theorem states this mathematically?

for example,take the non-autonomous differential system:
$$\frac{\mathrm{dx} }{\mathrm{d} t}=x^3 + aSin(\omega t)$$
$$|f(t,u)-f(t,v))|\leq L|u-v|$$
$$u^3 - aSin(\omega t)-v^3-aSin(\omega t)$$
$$|u^2+uv+v^2||u-v|\Rightarrow |u^2+uv+v^2|\leq L$$
 

Attachments

  • junk2.jpg
    junk2.jpg
    8.7 KB · Views: 523
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you clear on what the "Lipschitz" condition is? It is a condition on functions, not differential equations: A function has the "Lipschitz" property, or "is Lipschitz", on interval [a, b] if and only if there exist a number, c, such that |f(x)- f(y)|\le c|x- y| for all x and y in the interval.

The "Fundamental Existence and Uniqueness Theorem" for differential equations says that the if f(x,y) is continuous and is Lipschitz in y (x constant) in some neighborhood of (x_0, y_0), then equation dy/dx= f(x, y), has a unique solution satisfying y(x_0)= y_0,

I don't know where you got the idea that "non-autonomous" equations do not have unique solutions. That is certanly NOT true. Such equations have unique solutions in the same conditions as autonomous equations.

It is true that to apply the "existence and uniqueness" theorem to systems like dx/dt= f(x,y,t), dy/dt= g(x,y,t), you have to look at the equation
\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{g(x,y,t)}{f(x,y,t)}
so the theorem will not apply where f(x, y, t)= 0.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Are you clear on what the "Lipschitz" condition is? It is a condition on functions, not differential equations: A function has the "Lipschitz" property, or "is Lipschitz", on interval [a, b] if and only if there exist a number, c, such that |f(x)- f(y)|\le c|x- y| for all x and y in the interval.

The "Fundamental Existence and Uniqueness Theorem" for differential equations says that the if f(x,y) is continuous and is Lipschitz in y (x constant) in some neighborhood of (x_0, y_0), then equation dy/dx= f(x, y), has a unique solution satisfying y(x_0)= y_0,

I don't know where you got the idea that "non-autonomous" equations do not have unique solutions. That is certanly NOT true. Such equations have unique solutions in the same conditions as autonomous equations.

It is true that to apply the "existence and uniqueness" theorem to systems like dx/dt= f(x,y,t), dy/dt= g(x,y,t), you have to look at the equation
\frac{dy}{dx}= \frac{g(x,y,t)}{f(x,y,t)}
so the theorem will not apply where f(x, y, t)= 0.

But HallsofIvy, in the diagram I have attached,I show a period-2 orbit in a 2D continuous phase space. Notice that the orbit loops onto itself. This kind-of orbit cannot exist in autonomous systems because there will be no uniqueness as time progresses. So,my question is whether such a orbit exists in non-autonomous systems? I can intuitively guess that they do exist in N.A systems because there will be a phase change in the solution and so one can say that the solution curve is unique when it loops onto itself. How can I explain this uniqueness in N.A systems using Lipschitz condition? I wrote an example of Lipschitz uniqueness for non-autonomous systems and the coefficient is bounded.Does this suggest something?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K