When does quantum gravity become important?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conditions under which quantum gravity becomes significant, exploring the scales and physical situations where current models like quantum field theory (QFT) and general relativity (GR) may fail. Participants express curiosity about the specific factors, such as curvature, length, time, and acceleration, that influence the relevance of quantum effects in gravitational contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that quantum gravity becomes important at the Planck scale.
  • Others question whether there are any physical systems where both GR and QM are necessary to explain observations, indicating that current discussions may be largely academic.
  • A participant notes that there are no currently experimentally accessible situations where quantum gravity can be tested.
  • Concerns are raised about the lack of experimental guidance in reconciling GR and QFT, with some suggesting that theoretical exploration may be the only path forward.
  • Specific situations where current models fail include the big bang, endpoints of gravitational collapse, and black hole evaporation, which are described as singularities in classical and semiclassical GR.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a lack of consensus on the specific conditions under which quantum gravity becomes relevant, with multiple competing views on the significance of experimental guidance and the nature of theoretical exploration.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the absence of experimental results to guide theoretical developments and the reliance on abstract principles rather than empirical data to address the reconciliation of GR and QFT.

HomogenousCow
Messages
736
Reaction score
213
Title^
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tuesday, I think.

Can you be a bit more specific?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Tuesday, I think.

Can you be a bit more specific?

I am also curious as to what scales of curvature, length, time, acceleration and other possible factors make quantum effects important in gravity. Sorry for not using covariant quantities.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Tuesday, I think.

Can you be a bit more specific?

Amusing.
In what kind of a physical situations do our current models (QFT,standard model, GR) fail to predict with accuracy?
 
At the Plank scale.
 
Thanks - much clearer.

There is no system in which both GR and QM are necessary to explain observations. So at the moment this is a purely academic exercise.
 
No currently experimentally accessible situations
 
Is that the source of the difficulties? Having no physical results to go by.
For example SR, GR and QM were all guided by experiments which could not be accounted for at the time with classical theories.
 
The following quotations may be relevant:

Albert Einstein said:
The theorist's method involves his using as his foundation general postulates or "principles" from which he can deduce conclusions...

But as long as no principles are found on which to base the deduction, the individual experimental fact is of no use to the theorist; indeed he cannot even do anything with isolated general laws abstracted from experiments. He will remain helpless in the face of separate results of experimental research, until principles which he can make the basis of deductive reasoning have revealed themselves to him
Leonard Susskind said:
It seems unlikely that the usual incremental increase of knowledge from a combination of theory and experiment will ever get us where we want to go, that is, to the Plank scale. Under this circumstance our best hope is an examination of fundamental principles, paradoxes and contradictions, and the study of thought experiments.

Edward Witten said:
The inconsistency between general relativity and quantum field theory emerged clearly as the limitation of quantum field theory. This problem is a theorists' problem par excellence. Experiment provides little guide except for the bare fact that quantum field theory and general relativity both play a role in the description of natural law.

...

As I have indicated, experiment is not likely to provide detailed guidance about the reconciliation of general relativity with quantum field theory. One might therefore believe that the only hope is to emulate the history of general relativity, inventing by sheer thought a new mathematical framework which will generalize Riemannian geometry and will be capable of encompassing quantum field theory.
 
  • #10
In what kind of a physical situations do our current models (QFT,standard model, GR) fail to predict with accuracy?
Situations which in classical and semiclassical GR can be represented only as singularities.
a) The big bang
b) The endpoint of gravitational collapse
c) The endpoint of black hole evaporation
...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K