When does the ball come to rest?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a ball dropped from a height that bounces repeatedly, with its kinetic energy reducing to a quarter after each bounce. Participants are discussing how to determine the time it takes for the ball to come to rest.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring the use of geometric series to represent the kinetic energy and the time intervals between bounces. There are questions about the interpretation of the series and the relevance of total height versus time.

Discussion Status

Some participants have attempted to calculate the total height and time using geometric progressions, while others are questioning the relevance of these calculations to the original problem of finding the time until the ball comes to rest. There is an ongoing exploration of the time intervals between bounces.

Contextual Notes

Participants are noting the importance of showing working and equations to identify mistakes. There is a mention of the coefficient of restitution and its relation to the height, which may influence the calculations being discussed.

Gopal Mailpalli
Messages
28
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A ball is dropped vertically from a height H on to a plane surface and permitted to bounce repeatedly along a vertical line. After every bounce, its kinetic energy becomes a quarter of its kinetic energy before the bounce. The ball will come to rest after time?

Homework Equations


Kinetic Energy = ##\frac{1}{2}mv^{2}##
Velocity = ##\sqrt{2gRh}## , where R is the fraction of height ball reaches after every bounce

The Attempt at a Solution


I could recognize the geometrical series and attempted the solution which gave me a wrong time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gopal Mailpalli said:
I could recognize the geometrical series and attempted the solution which gave me a wrong time
Did you ? And how did you interpret the sum of this series to get the answer ?
 
BvU said:
Did you ? And how did you interpret the sum of this series to get the answer ?

Excuse me! Some where I did a mistake, i assumed the the initial Kinetic energy be K and next consecutive terms are (1/4)K, (1/4)^2 K ...
This represents a Geometric Progression, this is how I approached the problem.
 
Yes, that's what it says in the problem statement. So what series did you get and how did you work the sum of that series around to the answer you gave ?

There is a simple mistake that's easy to make here, but if I ask specifically I give away the answer, which is a bit against PF culture.
 
BvU said:
Yes, that's what it says in the problem statement. So what series did you get and how did you work the sum of that series around to the answer you gave ?

There is a simple mistake that's easy to make here, but if I ask specifically I give away the answer, which is a bit against PF culture.

I found the coefficient of restitution which is 0.5, found out the height using the respective COR - Height relation and formed a geometric progression. I calculated the total height and went further to solve the time it takes using basic laws of motion.
 
Gopal Mailpalli said:
I found the coefficient of restitution which is 0.5, found out the height using the respective COR - Height relation and formed a geometric progression. I calculated the total height and went further to solve the time it takes using basic laws of motion.

You have to post your working, equations and all. We can't spot a mistake from a description of what you did.
 
I don't understand what you did. Can you post your working ?
Why bother to find a total height ? The exercise asks for a time.
What total height did you find ? Something like ##4h\over 3## ?
 
BvU said:
I don't understand what you did. Can you post your working ?
Why bother to find a total height ? The exercise asks for a time.
What total height did you find ? Something like ##4h\over 3## ?

I mean sum of the geometric progression, which i got 4h/3.
 
Nice, but useless: the total time has nothing to do with the time needed to fall 4h/3 (why not ?).
 
  • #10
BvU said:
Nice, but useless: the total time has nothing to do with the time needed to fall 4h/3 (why not ?).

Then how do I approach the problem? I don't have an idea.
 
  • #11
You will also get a geometric series if you calculate the sum of the times the ball needs to get back to the ground after each bounce.
 
  • #12
BvU said:
You will also get a geometric series if you calculate the sum of the times the ball needs to get back to the ground after each bounce.

Still, i couldn't solve the problem.
 
  • #13
Gopal Mailpalli said:
Still, i couldn't solve the problem.
It's a bit easier to see what is going on if you look at the time between bounces.
Between first and second bounce, how long is it in the air?
What about between second and third bounces?
What is the pattern?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K