Undergrad When should I use a plus or minus sign in space and time translations?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the use of plus or minus signs in space and time translation operators, specifically in the equations U(t) = e^{±iHt/ħ} and T(x) = e^{±ixp/ħ}. It is noted that the reference text by Ballentine typically uses a positive sign for these operators, particularly in Chapter 3. The confusion arises from whether the translation refers to the observing apparatus or the object being observed, affecting the sign used in measurements. A derivation of the wave function illustrates that reversing the sign is necessary when translating the wave function in the opposite direction. The conversation highlights that different textbooks may adopt varying sign conventions, which can lead to misunderstandings.
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am a bit confused about the sign in space and time translation operators acting on a state. I found it with both plus and minus sign and I am not sure which one to use when. The equations I am talking about are: $$U(t)=e^{\pm iHt/\hbar}$$ and $$T(x)=e^{\pm ixp/\hbar}$$. Is it a plus or a minus in the exponent? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems to vary a bit, but my reference, Ballentine has it as positive in accordance with what I say below.

For the detail on this and other associated matters see Chapter 3 - Ballentine - Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development. In particular see page 66 - equation 3.4 where you see in general its positive for any such operator - time translation, space translation, rotational translation or whatever. Sometimes however the following can confuse the issue. When you speak of a translation do you move the observing apparatus or what is being observed? As an example for a position measurement if you move the measuring equipment a distance d you subtract d from everything measured. Move the thing being measured and you add d - it can be confusing.

The above does not prove the important Wigner's Theorem which is associated with it as well:
https://arxiv.org/abs/0808.0779

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Charles Link
It might help to start with a simple derivation on the wave function ##\Psi(x) ##: ## \\ ## ## \Psi(x+\Delta x)=\Psi(x)+(\frac{\partial{\Psi}}{\partial{x}}) \Delta x=\Psi(x)+\frac{i}{\hbar} \hat{p} \Psi \, \Delta x ##. ## \\ ## This operator equation can be integrated to get ## \Psi(x+x_o)=e^{+\frac{i}{\hbar} x_o \hat{p} } \Psi(x) ##. ## \\ ## If you are trying to find ## \Psi(x-x_o) ##, you reverse the signs. ## \\ ## These formulas can get complicated depending on whether the wave function is being translated or the axes. As @bhobba has mentioned, the textbooks will use different sign conventions at times.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and bhobba
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
941
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K