- #1
LightbulbSun
- 65
- 2
http://www.lockergnome.com/oztech/2008/07/06/smoking-does-not-cause-cancer/"
I was thinking about how flawed this line of thinking is. Your brain produces DMT naturally, but does that mean we should go hallucinate on some DMT? No. When will people stop making excuses?
Smoking Does Not Cause Cancer
Sunday, July 6th, 2008
by oztech
That’s right. It doesn’t. Smoking does not cause cancer. You know what? Neither does the sun. You might say “How can you say that? Studies have shown….” or “My grandfather died of lung cancer because of cigarettes!”. No he didn’t, but before you rip me a new one in the comments section, hear me out. Anything you’ve ever heard about causing cancer does some sort of damage to cells, right? Cigarettes can kill cells in your lungs, mouth and throat. The sun kills skin cells. Sometimes when the cells rebuild themselves, they become ‘mutated’ and cancerous cells are born. Does the cigarette smoke or sun actually cause the cells to be cancerous? I don’t believe so. Does it put a person at increased risk of cancer? Yes, I would agree with that.
My point is that many ‘experts’ blame cancer on certain products such as cigarettes. I don’t believe these products actually cause cancer though. A human should be able to damage cells and the cells should regrow naturally regardless of how they were damaged. It’s how the body was designed. I believe the cause of cancer is something deeper in the body that doesn’t allow our bodies to always rebuild cells properly. Deeper than what cigarettes or sun can touch. We’re all blaming the wrong elements. The solution is not to stay out of the sun and to not smoke. The solution is to find out what causes our cells to become cancerous and target it.
I was thinking about how flawed this line of thinking is. Your brain produces DMT naturally, but does that mean we should go hallucinate on some DMT? No. When will people stop making excuses?
Last edited by a moderator: