Can Marijuana's Active Ingredient Prevent or Reverse Alzheimer's Disease?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alfi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Memory Paradox
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Recent research indicates that THC, an active ingredient in marijuana, may have the potential to prevent or reverse Alzheimer's disease by reducing brain inflammation and promoting neurogenesis. A study published in the December 2008 issue of Neurobiology of Aging demonstrated that the compound WIN-55,212-2, which activates the same cannabinoid receptors as THC, improved memory in older rats. Researchers emphasize that while THC can impair memory in the short term, its long-term effects on older brains may be beneficial due to differences in how young and old brains process memory. This research opens avenues for further investigation into the therapeutic applications of cannabinoids in neurodegenerative diseases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cannabinoid receptors and their functions
  • Knowledge of neurogenesis and its role in brain health
  • Familiarity with Alzheimer's disease pathology and treatment options
  • Awareness of the effects of THC and other cannabinoids on the brain
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of WIN-55,212-2 on neurodegenerative diseases
  • Explore the role of glutamate in memory formation and Alzheimer's treatment
  • Investigate the potential of cannabinoids in reducing neuroinflammation
  • Examine existing studies on THC and its long-term effects on cognitive health
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in neurobiology, healthcare professionals focused on Alzheimer's treatment, and individuals interested in the therapeutic potential of cannabinoids for neurodegenerative disorders.

  • #31
Are new drugs tested for Psychological effects as well as Physiological effects?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #32
Evo said:
Yes, and I believe that this is being done, as you mentioned.

It's the people smoking it for pleasure and saying recreational use of it should be legal because it could have benefits if the active ingredients could be made into a medcine that I find blowing smoke, so to speak. :wink:

I know alcoholics who rationalize the same way. However, they're legally justified to drink and probably only because they're more violent protesters (for instance, Prohibition was a mess. Do not take the bottle away from Joe the Plumber.)

I agree with most libertarians on this issue. If alcohol is legal, than there's no reason why any other mind altering substances shouldn't be legal simply for their recreational use (as long as they're relatively safe, which marijuana is often considered by society; it's often considered safer than alcohol). If it's legal, then at least it is controlled. This way it can also be separated from organized crime where more dangerous drugs are.

In addition, legalization would result in much less harassment of medical marijuana patients. They'd also be able to find it or grow it themselves. That's not the main argument, but it's a supporting argument for legalization.
 
  • #33
Alfi said:
Are new drugs tested for Psychological effects as well as Physiological effects?

If the drug is meant to be a psychopharmaceutical or if it has a strong binding affinity for brain receptors and is able to cross the blood-brain barrier then yes of course this is done.

If there is no a priori reason to think that a drug is psychoactive then testing is almost certainly more haphazard. I've heard (possibly apocryphal) stories about a certain drug with hallucinogenic properties (supposedly stronger than LSD) making it to stage 3 clinical trials and being described as causing a "behavioral syndrome" without further explanation. This drug was never approved.

The fact is, we know very little about how psychoactive substances produce their effects. This goes for everything from Prozac to LSD. We've made a lot of progress- especially with cocaine (and the DA system in general) but there's a long way to go. The starting place for the field is usually:

"we know this or that drug produces this or that effect and we know that it targets this receptor which is located on these neurons" What we are missing is what happens in between...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
3K