MHB Where Did I Go Wrong in Calculating the Value of x in These Triangle Problems?

  • Thread starter Thread starter eleventhxhour
  • Start date Start date
eleventhxhour
Messages
73
Reaction score
0
View attachment 2480

3) Determine the value of x to the nearest centimetre.

So for 3a) I found the angles of each of the sides by subtracting 180 (D is 55 on the first triangle, and 45 degrees on the second). Then I found "f" (the side opposite angle F) by using the Sine law, and I got 18cm. Then I used the sine law to find the length of the dashed line and I got 8.6cm. Then with this, I used the sine law again to calculate x. In the end, I got 12.2 cm. However, the answer in the textbook is 15cm. What did I do wrong?

For 3b, I did something similar. I found that the smaller triangle is isosceles, so the angles are: D is 70 degrees, B is 40 degrees and the one that isn't labelled is also 70 degrees. On the bigger triangle, angle B is 63 degrees. Then I used the sine law to calculate the horizontal line from B. I got 21.9cm. Then I used the sine law again to calculate x, which I found to be 48.2. However, the textbook says that x = 37.9cm. What did I do wrong?

Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • 20140513_180009.jpg
    20140513_180009.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 115
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For 3a) I get:

$$x=\frac{15\sqrt{2}\sin\left(35^{\circ}\right)}{\sin\left(55^{\circ}\right)}\text{ cm}\approx15\text{ cm}$$

For 3b) I get:

$$x=\frac{15\sin\left(70^{\circ}\right)}{\sin\left(27^{\circ}\right)\sin\left(55^{\circ}\right)}\text{ cm}\approx38\text{cm}$$

Your textbook is correct. I am unsure what you've done...you say you applied the sine law, but how you applied it I am not sure.
 
MarkFL said:
For 3a) I get:

$$x=\frac{15\sqrt{2}\sin\left(35^{\circ}\right)}{\sin\left(55^{\circ}\right)}\text{ cm}\approx15\text{ cm}$$

For 3b) I get:

$$x=\frac{15\sin\left(70^{\circ}\right)}{\sin\left(27^{\circ}\right)\sin\left(55^{\circ}\right)}\text{ cm}\approx38\text{cm}$$

Your textbook is correct. I am unsure what you've done...you say you applied the sine law, but how you applied it I am not sure.

Alright, so I did 3a) again and got the correct answer. But I'm still getting around 48cm for 3b). Here's what I did:

View attachment 2481
 

Attachments

  • 3b.jpg
    3b.jpg
    8.3 KB · Views: 118
You can only apply the Pythagorean theorem to right triangles. The isosceles triangle has a $70^{\circ}$, and therefore the other two equal angles $\theta$ are:

$$70^{\circ}+2\theta=180^{\circ}$$

$$2\theta=110^{\circ}$$

$$\theta=55^{\circ}$$

And so, using the Law of Sines, we find:

$$\frac{\overline{BC}}{\sin\left(70^{\circ}\right)}=\frac{15}{\sin\left(55^{\circ}\right)}$$

Hence:

$$\overline{BC}=\frac{15\sin\left(70^{\circ}\right)}{\sin\left(55^{\circ}\right)}$$

Now, using the definition of the sine function, we find:

$$\sin\left(27^{\circ}\right)=\frac{\overline{BC}}{x}$$

$$x=\frac{\overline{BC}}{\sin\left(27^{\circ}\right)}=\frac{15\sin\left(70^{\circ}\right)}{\sin\left(27^{\circ}\right)\sin\left(55^{\circ}\right)}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top