1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Where does other energy go when matter and antimatter annihilate?

  1. Aug 13, 2011 #1
    If a particle has a certain potential energy then collides with its antiparticle, releasing energy according to [itex]E=2mc^2[/itex], what happens to the PE of the two particles?

    Let's say that a particle has a gravitational potential energy of X, wouldn't the antiparticle need to have a GPE of -X in order to preserve the conservation of energy? Wouldn't that imply that antimatter is repelled by gravity?

    Thanks for the help.
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 13, 2011 #2

    cmb

    User Avatar

    Mesons and gammas.

    Electrons and positrons produce [only] two directionally-opposite 511 keV gammas (their rest-mass energy).

    I expect gravitational energy is all wrapped up in the rest-mass energy equation, somehow. There again, you can expect a symmetrical expulsion of mesons also from more massive reactions, so I guess the answer is that a half of the energy heads down the gravitational field and a half up it, so no net change to any gravity considerations, perhaps?
     
  4. Aug 13, 2011 #3

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    The resulting photons have a gravitational PE also. (In spacetimes where energy is conserved)
     
  5. Aug 13, 2011 #4
    So what would happen to other energies, such as kinetic energy? Let's say two antiparticles collide with certain velocities, v; where would their KE manifest itself after annihilation?
     
  6. Aug 13, 2011 #5

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    In greater energy of the products. In fact, that is essentially the whole point of building high energy colliders.
     
  7. Aug 13, 2011 #6
    The photons would have greater energy.
     
  8. Aug 13, 2011 #7
    I was under the impression when matter and anti matter meet it is simply a conversion of matter to energy 100% much like a nuclear bomb while a atomic bombs conversion rate of like 0.02 % matter to energy not really sure on the numbers. A matter anti matter explosion would leave nothing but energy. And if you are wondering what happens to any gravitational potential energy if there is no matter there is no gravity and i think you have to have at least 2 bodies to have gravitational potential energy so it would just be returned to the other body. If two rocks made of matter are orbiting one an other, and one is stuck by a anti matter rock all the stored gravitational potential energy would be given to the reaming rock. Or if you had a lb 10 ball of matter and a 10lb ball of anti matter moving at 50 km/s when they meet and exploded the explosion would take into account that gravitational potential energy and the explosion would have a velocity of 25 km/s in the direction that the anti matter ball had been moving at 50km/s before they collided relative to space around it. We would have a hard time seeing this as it would be in the middle of a explosion. At the end of the day no energy/matter has been gained or lost everyone is happy unless i am totally crazy and wrong and i could be.

    P.S. there is anti matter on planet earth and i have not heard of any anti gravity properties as that would be amazing, awesome and would make some sense of the universe.
     
  9. Aug 13, 2011 #8
    This is true for particles that annihilate at rest. Conservation of energy demands that any kinetic energy that the particles had before they annihilated must remain, i.e. if a positron and an electron came together with 1 unit of kinetic energy each, then the two resultant photons after annihilation will each have energy of mc²+1 units where m is the mass of either the positron or electron.


    This is not true. Photons (which have zero mass) are effected by gravity.

    Yes, this is true.

    This makes absolutely no sense. What actually happens is that the products of the annihilation still have potential energy (with respect to the other rock, in your example).

    I really have no idea what this example has to do with gravitational potential energy. What you described is an example of conservation of momentum (at non-relativistic speeds).

    Not long-term. Once it appears it is annihilated almost immediately, though there is some small amount on (or in) Earth at any given time.

    I'm not really sure what that has to do with anything, but antimatter does not have negative mass so it wouldn't result in "anti-gravity." What it has is the opposite charge to its matter counterpart.
     
    Last edited: Aug 13, 2011
  10. Aug 13, 2011 #9

    diazona

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    I was actually just reading something today that says that's not necessarily true. According to the article, although antimatter does have positive (inertial) mass, we've never created enough to actually check that it responds to gravity in the same way as normal matter.
     
  11. Aug 13, 2011 #10

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    I have never understood this phrase. What is this unembodied energy that matter is supposed to be transformed into? Generally matter is converted into photons or other bosons.
     
  12. Aug 13, 2011 #11
    Thank you for the read. An edited version of my earlier statement should be: "There is no evidence at this time to suggest that antimatter responds to gravity any differently than matter."
     
  13. Aug 13, 2011 #12
    i said
    And if you are wondering what happens to any gravitational potential energy if there is no matter there is no gravity

    and you said
    This is not true. Photons (which have zero mass) are effected by gravity..... really..

    I said no mass no gravity are you going to tell me that Photons have gravity?
    If photons have gravity they has mass.
    If photons do not have mass they do not have gravity.

    witch of these answers is true?

    Everything else i said are simple examples of how i could answer the guys question perhaps you could build on something i said or something else said i like building because it takes people places. Telling use your opinion not if you think we or i am right or wrong not trying to be rude :)
     
  14. Aug 13, 2011 #13

    diazona

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper

    Well, I'm not Superstring, but...
    Yes.
    Neither of those statements is true. Photons have zero mass, but they are affected by gravity, and general relativity predicts that they do attract other bodies gravitationally.
     
  15. Aug 13, 2011 #14

    Dale

    Staff: Mentor

    Really, really. Even in Newtonian physics massless particles will be accelerated by gravity.


    Yes. Not only are they affected by gravity they can produce a gravitational field. Google pp-wave spacetime.


    This is not correct. The source of gravity is not mass. It is the stress energy tensor, which is non zero for light.
     
  16. Aug 13, 2011 #15
    Photons are effected by Gravity but only indirectly. Any mass creates a gravitational field which warps space-time around it. Photons travel through space-time as light in a straight line (as a energy carrier). If space time warps to the left so do the photons passing though it. So gravity warps space-time and space-time effects lights passing through it. This is how photons can be effected by gravity indirectly and still have zero mass.
     
  17. Aug 13, 2011 #16

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    CDGraig123: Read the last line of DaleSpam's last post very carefully. Dale is correct, you are not. The source of gravity is the stress energy tensor, not mass. A bucketful of photons (a mirrored bucket full of photons) can act as a gravitational source.
     
  18. Aug 13, 2011 #17
    The stress-energy tensor is the source of the gravitational field in the Einstein field equations of general relativity, just as mass is the source of such a field in Newtonian gravity. Now I wonder where gravity comes from in string theory so now that I have researched more theory I will do what so many fail to do. I do not know for sure where gravity comes from.

    Oh I forgot Quantum gravity theory in my list of ideas of where gravity comes from.
     
    Last edited: Aug 14, 2011
  19. Aug 14, 2011 #18
    Its interesting you ask that I really love questions like this (the kind with no real answer). I would guess anything that was not matter but was energy or that could carry energy like a photon. I am sure there would be some form of radiation and lots of heat. The only real world thing I can draw on is a PET scan. A PET scan an injection of Positrons or (anti-electrons) into your blood stream. When positrons meet with electrons in your brain they annihilate one an other, turning into energy and a Gamma ray witch the scanners pick up. This makes a image of your brain. I am really digging deep on this one, as I have no idea if Positrons would react like anti matter will when it is introduced with it's opposite charged counter part. In other words if i had to guess a matter anti matter explosion would be a big gamma ray heat bomb you wouldn't wanna be in the same room. :) :) :)
     
  20. Aug 14, 2011 #19

    A.T.

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Photons are affected by Gravity in the same way as all objects. The acceleration of an object due to gravity is independent of object's mass, in both: Newtonian Physics and General Relativity.

    All free falling objects travel through space-time in a straight line, or geodesic.
     
  21. Aug 14, 2011 #20
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Where does other energy go when matter and antimatter annihilate?
  1. Where does energy go? (Replies: 5)

Loading...